Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27269126›Full record

ReviewLeukemia & lymphoma2016

Incorporating measurable ('minimal') residual disease-directed treatment strategies to optimize outcomes in adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

Kristen Pettit, Wendy Stock, Roland B Walter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia & lymphoma, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Measurable Residual Disease.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristen Pettita Section of Hematology/Oncology and University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center , University of Chicago , Chicago , IL , USA ;
Wendy Stocka Section of Hematology/Oncology and University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center , University of Chicago , Chicago , IL , USA ;
Roland B Walterb Clinical Research Division , Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center , Seattle , WA , USA ;

Funding

BASIC RESEARCH TRAINING IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGYT32CA009566 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLUFUNMILAYO F. OLOPADE · 1987 to 2026
$10.5M
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICST32GM007019 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Peter Hugh O'Donnell, MARK J RATAIN · 1985 to 2026
$8.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009566NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Curative-intent therapy leads to complete remissions in many adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but relapse remains common. Numerous studies have unequivocally demonstrated that the persistence of measurable ('minimal') residual disease (MRD) at the submicroscopic level during morphologic remission identifies patients at high risk of disease recurrence and short survival. This association has provided the impetus to customize anti-leukemia therapy based on MRD data, a strategy that is now routinely pursued in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). While it is currently uncertain whether this approach will improve outcomes in AML other than APL, randomized studies have validated MRD-based risk-stratified treatment algorithms in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Here, we review the available studies examining MRD-directed therapy in AML, appraise their strengths and limitations, and discuss avenues for future investigation.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNeoplasm, ResidualTreatment OutcomeAcute myeloid leukemia (AML)adultmeasurable residual disease (MRD)prognosisrisk-directed therapy

Identifiers

PMID27269126
PMCPMC4968046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.