Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27268157›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug safety2016

Surveillance systems and methods for monitoring the post-marketing safety of influenza vaccines at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Pedro L Moro, Rongxia Li, Penina Haber, Eric Weintraub, Maria Cano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Myopericarditis After COVID-19 Booster Dose Vaccination.The American journal of cardiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Influenza vaccines: Evaluation of the safety profile.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pedro L Moroa Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion , National Center for Zoonotic and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Rongxia Lia Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion , National Center for Zoonotic and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Penina Habera Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion , National Center for Zoonotic and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Eric Weintrauba Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion , National Center for Zoonotic and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Maria Canoa Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion , National Center for Zoonotic and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta , GA , USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnnual influenza vaccine safety monitoring is an important component of the influenza vaccination program in the United States to ensure that vaccines are safe, which is important for maintaining public trust in the national vaccination program. This is specially the case for influenza vaccines since the antigen composition of the viruses of which the vaccine is made often changes from one season to the next, based on the circulating strain of influenza virus. AREAS COVERED: This review describes the two surveillance systems used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to monitor the safety of influenza vaccines: 1) the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS); and 2) the Vaccine Safety datalink (VSD). EXPERT OPINION: VAERS and VSD are used routinely to monitor the safety of influenza vaccines in the United States, and over the years they have demonstrated their value in monitoring vaccine safety since their implementation in 1990. Both systems, although different, complemented each other well to study febrile seizures in young children following influenza vaccination during the 2010-2011 influenza season. Other examples of potential safety concerns after influenza vaccines are also presented and discussed.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.HumansImmunization ProgramsInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesUnited StatesInfluenza VaccinesEpidemiologyinfluenza vaccinesurveillancevaccine safetyVAERSVSD

Identifiers

PMID27268157
PMCPMC6500454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.