Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27268006›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2016

Study protocol: realist evaluation of effectiveness and sustainability of a community health workers programme in improving maternal and child health in Nigeria.

Tolib Mirzoev, Enyi Etiaba, Bassey Ebenso, Benjamin Uzochukwu, Ana Manzano, Obinna Onwujekwe, Reinhard Huss, Nkoli Ezumah, Joseph P Hicks, James Newell and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sustainable Return to Work for Workers with Mental Health and Musculoskeletal Conditions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Conducting focus groups in realist evaluation.Evaluation (London, England : 1995) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tolib MirzoevNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, UK.
Enyi EtiabaHealth Policy Research Group & the Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, 400001, Nigeria. enyi.etiaba@unn.edu.ng.
Bassey EbensoNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, UK.
Benjamin UzochukwuHealth Policy Research Group & the Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, 400001, Nigeria.
Ana ManzanoSchool of Sociology and Social Policy, Social Sciences Building, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Obinna OnwujekweHealth Policy Research Group & the Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, 400001, Nigeria.
Reinhard HussNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, UK.
Nkoli EzumahHealth Policy Research Group & the Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, 400001, Nigeria.
Joseph P HicksNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, UK.
James NewellNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, UK.
Timothy EnsorNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Nigeria · NGNuffield Health · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M01472X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAchievement of improved maternal and child health (MCH) outcomes continues to be an issue of international priority, particularly for sub-Saharan African countries such as Nigeria. Evidence suggests that the use of Community Health Workers (CHWs) can be effective in broadening access to, and coverage of, health services and improving MCH outcomes in such countries. METHODS/

designIn this paper, we report the methodology for a 5-year study which aims to evaluate the context, processes, outcomes and longer-term sustainability of a Nigerian CHW scheme. Evaluation of complex interventions requires a comprehensive understanding of intervention context, mechanisms and outcomes. The multidisciplinary and mixed-method realist approach will facilitate such evaluation. A favourable policy environment within which the study is conducted will ensure the successful uptake of results into policy and practice. A realist evaluation provides an overall methodological framework for this multidisciplinary and mixed methods research, which will be undertaken in Anambra state. The study will draw upon health economics, social sciences and statistics. The study comprises three steps: (1) initial theory development; (2) theory validation and (3) theory refinement and development of lessons learned. Specific methods for data collection will include in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with purposefully identified key stakeholders (managers, service providers and service users), document reviews, analyses of quantitative data from the CHW programme and health information system, and a small-scale survey. The impact of the programme on key output and outcome indicators will be assessed through an interrupted time-series analysis (ITS) of monthly quantitative data from health information system and programme reports. Ethics approvals for this study were obtained from the University of Leeds and the University of Nigeria. DISCUSSION: This study will provide a timely and important contribution to health systems strengthening specifically within Anambra state in southeast Nigeria but also more widely across Nigeria. This paper should be of interest to researchers who are interested in adapting and applying robust methodologies for assessing complex health system interventions. The paper will also be useful to policymakers and practitioners who are interested in commissioning and engaging in such complex evaluations to inform policies and practices.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersMaternal Health ServicesResearch DesignAdultChildChild HealthChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMaleMaternal HealthNigeriaProgram EvaluationCommunity health workersConditional cash transferHealth systems researchMaternal and child healthMixed methodsNigeriaRealist evaluation

Identifiers

PMID27268006
PMCPMC4896007
OpenAlexW2417567978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.