ArticleBMC infectious diseases2016
Global research trends of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Literature on the Early Phase of COVID-19 in Italy.Frontiers in public health · 2021Pooled it
- Reconstruction of the Discourse on Influenza During Pandemics Between 1889 and 1980 in the Predecessor Journal of Swiss Medical Weekly - A Narrative Review and Bibliometric Analysis.Public health reviews · 2025Review
- Trends in Aflatoxin MIranian journal of public health · 2024Article
- Gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorders: where do we stand?Gut pathogens · 2023Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of the Publications on Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Published Between 2012-2022.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2023Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on the Omicron Variant from 2020 to 2022 in the Scopus Database Using R and VOSviewer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Contribution of Saudi Arabia to regional and global publications on COVID-19-related research: A bibliometric and visualization analysis.Journal of infection and public health · 2022Review
- COVID-19 Medical Research in Oman: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study.Oman medical journal · 2022Article
- NeuroCOVID-19: a critical review.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2022Review
- Predicting Infectious Diseases: A Bibliometric Review on Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Global research trends in MERS-CoV: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis from 2012 to 2021.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries?Scientometrics · 2022Article
- A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Coronavirus in the Past 3 Decades: A Bibliometric Article.Iranian journal of public health · 2021Review
- Current global research landscape on COVID-19 and depressive disorders: Bibliometric and visualization analysis.World journal of psychiatry · 2021Article
- An overview of basic molecular biology of SARS-CoV-2 and current COVID-19 prevention strategies.Gene reports · 2021Review
- Characterization of an Open-Access Medical News Platform's Readership During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Observational
- The Arab region's contribution to global COVID-19 research: Bibliometric and visualization analysis.Globalization and health · 2021Article
- A scientometric analysis on coronaviruses research (1900-2020): Time for a continuous, cooperative and global approach.Journal of infection and public health · 2021Article
- Medical negligence in healthcare organizations and its impact on patient safety and public health: a bibliometric study.F1000Research · 2021Article
- A bibliometric analysis of pandemic and epidemic studies in economics: future agenda for COVID-19 research.Social sciences & humanities open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMiddle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a virus that causes severe viral pneumonia in humans, known to have a high mortality rate and a similarity in clinical symptoms with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. It was first isolated in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) in 2012 and after that, MERS-CoV exhibited outbreaks in several regions of the world. This study aimed to assess the characteristics of publications involving MERS-CoV at global level by using a bibliometric analysis.
methodsScopus database was searched on March 4, 2016 for MERS-CoV publications published between 2012 and 2015. It was performed on the same day in order to avoid the possible bias came from update on the database because the metrics are changing over time. All publication types were considered; however publications as errata were excluded. Analysis parameters include year of publication, publication type, patterns of international collaboration, research institutions, journals, impact factor, h-index, language, and times cited.
resultsA total of 883 MERS-CoV research publications were published across the world. The MERS-CoV-associated publications were originated from 92 countries/territories, indicating the international spread of MERS-CoV research. The USA was the largest contributor, with 319 articles published over 4 years, followed by KSA (113 articles). The total number of citations for these publications has already achieved 8,015, with an average of 9.01 citations per each publication. The h-index for MERS-CoV-associated publications was 48. The USA also have the highest h-index (32), followed by KSA (26) and UK (22). Netherland produced the greatest proportion of publications with international research collaboration (72.7 %) followed by the UK (71 %) and Germany (69.1 %) out of the total number of publications for each country.
conclusionsThere is a rapid increase in research activities related to MERS-CoV from 2012 to 2015. This study demonstrates that the MERS-CoV related literature has grown to be more extensive and global over the past 4 years. The bulk of publications in the field of MERS-CoV research are published by high-income countries such as the USA. Furthermore, the USA, the UK and KSA may have higher quality of articles according to the value of h-index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.