Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27267213›Full record

ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2016

Bacteriological quality of bottled drinking water versus municipal tap water in Dharan municipality, Nepal.

Narayan Dutt Pant, Nimesh Poudyal, Shyamal Kumar Bhattacharya

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microbial and Chemical Water Quality Assessments Across the Rural and Urban Areas of Nepal: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Drinking Water Investigation of Hill Tribes: A Case Study in Northern Thailand.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Narayan Dutt PantDepartment of Microbiology, Grande International Hospital, Dhapasi, Kathmandu, Nepal. ndpant1987@gmail.com.
Nimesh PoudyalDepartment of Microbiology, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Shyamal Kumar BhattacharyaDepartment of Microbiology, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences · NPGrande International Hospital · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWater-related diseases are of great concern in developing countries like Nepal. Every year, there are countless morbidity and mortality due to the consumption of unsafe drinking water. Recently, there have been increased uses of bottled drinking water in an assumption that the bottled water is safer than the tap water and its use will help to protect from water-related diseases. So, the main objective of this study was to analyze the bacteriological quality of bottled drinking water and that of municipal tap water.

methodsA total of 100 samples (76 tap water and 24 bottled water) were analyzed for bacteriological quality and pH. The methods used were spread plate method for total plate count (TPC) and membrane filter method for total coliform count (TCC), fecal coliform count (FCC), and fecal streptococcal count (FSC). pH meter was used for measuring pH.

resultsOne hundred percent of the tap water samples and 87.5 % of the bottled water samples were found to be contaminated with heterotrophic bacteria. Of the tap water samples, 55.3 % were positive for total coliforms, compared with 25 % of the bottled water. No bottled water samples were positive for fecal coliforms and fecal streptococci, in contrast to 21.1 % and 14.5 % of the tap water samples being contaminated with fecal coliforms and fecal streptococci, respectively. One hundred percent of the tap water samples and 54.2 % of the bottled water samples had pH in the acceptable range.

conclusionsAll of the municipal tap water samples and most of the bottled drinking water samples distributed in Dharan municipality were found to be contaminated with one or more than one type of indicator organisms. On the basis of our findings, we may conclude that comparatively, the bottled drinking water may have been safer (than tap water) to drink.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyWater QualityColony Count, MicrobialDrinking WaterEnterobacteriaceaeFecesHumansNepalStreptococcusWater SupplyDrinking WaterBacteriological qualityFecal coliform countFecal streptococcal countTotal coliform countTotal plate count

Identifiers

PMID27267213
PMCPMC5025974
OpenAlexW2417441203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.