Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27267203›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2016

Questions regarding the safety and duration of immunity following live yellow fever vaccination.

Ian J Amanna, Mark K Slifka

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Duration of Protection After Vaccination Against Yellow Fever: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Epidemic Outbreaks Related to Yellow Fever Viruses.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Reply to Martin and Dauby.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ian J Amannaa Najít Technologies, Inc. , Beaverton , OR , USA.
Mark K Slifkab Division of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology , Oregon Health & Science University , Beaverton , OR , USA.
Najít Technologies (United States) · USOregon National Primate Research Center · US

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
Development of an H2O2-Inactivated Dengue Virus VaccineR01AI098723 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SLIFKA, MARK K · 2012 to 2016
$7.3M
Development of a Yellow Fever Vaccine for Vulnerable PopulationR44AI079898 · NIAID · NAJIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · PI AMANNA, IAN JAMES, SLIFKA, MARK K · 2011 to 2020
$6.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI098723NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI079898NIH HHS P51 OD011092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe World Health Organization (WHO) and other health agencies have concluded that yellow fever booster vaccination is unnecessary since a single dose of vaccine confers lifelong immunity. Areas covered: We reviewed the clinical studies cited by health authorities in their investigation of both the safety profile and duration of immunity for the YFV-17D vaccine and examined the position that booster vaccination is no longer needed. We found that antiviral immunity may be lost in 1-in-3 to 1-in-5 individuals within 5 to 10 years after a single vaccination and that children may be at greater risk for primary vaccine failure. The safety profile of YFV-17D was compared to other licensed vaccines including oral polio vaccine (OPV) and the rotavirus vaccine, RotaShield, which have subsequently been withdrawn from the US and world market, respectively. Expert commentary: Based on these results and recent epidemiological data on vaccine failures (particularly evident at >10 years after vaccination), we believe that current recommendations to no longer administer YFV-17D booster vaccination be carefully re-evaluated, and that further development of safer vaccine approaches should be considered.

Indexed as

HumansImmunization, SecondaryTime FactorsTreatment FailureYellow FeverYellow Fever VaccineYellow Fever Vaccineantibody durationflavivirusesimmunityneurotropicvaccinationviscerotropicYellow fever virus

Identifiers

PMID27267203
PMCPMC5171234
OpenAlexW2412755673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.