Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27267151›Full record

Trial reportJournal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)2016

Mindfulness Meditation-Based Intervention Is Feasible, Acceptable, and Safe for Chronic Low Back Pain Requiring Long-Term Daily Opioid Therapy.

Aleksandra E Zgierska, Cindy A Burzinski, Jennifer Cox, John Kloke, Janice Singles, Shilagh Mirgain, Aaron Stegner, Dane B Cook, Miroslav Bačkonja

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review of the Adherence to Home-Practice Meditation Exercises in Patients with Chronic Pain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksandra E Zgierska1 Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison , School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Cindy A Burzinski1 Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison , School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Jennifer Cox1 Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison , School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
John Kloke2 Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison , School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Janice Singles3 Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison , School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Shilagh Mirgain3 Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison , School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Aaron Stegner4 Research Service, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI.
Dane B Cook4 Research Service, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI.
Miroslav Bačkonja6 Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin-Madison , School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Wisconsin Division of Public Health · USUniversity of Wisconsin Health · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough mindfulness meditation (MM) is increasingly used for chronic pain treatment, limited evidence supports its clinical application for opioid-treated chronic low back pain (CLBP). The goal of this study was to determine feasibility, acceptability, and safety of an MM-based intervention in patients with CLBP requiring daily opioid therapy.

design26-week pilot randomized controlled trial comparing MM-based intervention, combined with usual care, to usual care alone.

settingOutpatient. PATIENTS: Adults with CLBP treated with ≥30 mg of morphine-equivalent dose (MED) per day for 3 months or longer.

interventionsTargeted MM-based intervention consisted of eight weekly 2-hour group sessions and home practice (30 minutes/d, 6 days/wk) during the study. "Usual care" for opioid-treated CLBP was provided to participants by their regular clinicians. OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility and acceptability of the MM intervention were assessed by adherence to intervention protocol and treatment satisfaction among experimental participants. Safety was evaluated by inquiry about side effects/adverse events and opioid dose among all study participants.

resultsThirty-five participants enrolled during the 10-week recruitment period. The mean age (±standard deviation) was 51.8 ± 9.7 years; the patients were predominantly female, with substantial CLBP-related pain and disability, and treated with 148.3 ± 129.2 mg of MED per day. All participants completed baseline assessments; none missed both follow-up assessments or withdrew. Among experimental participants (n = 21), 19 attended 1 or more intervention sessions and 14 attended 4 or more. They reported, on average, 164.0 ± 122.1 minutes of formal practice per week during the 26-week study and 103.5 ± 111.5 minutes of brief, informal practice per week. Seventeen patients evaluated the intervention, indicating satisfaction; their qualitative responses described the course as useful for pain management (n = 10) and for improving pain coping skills (n = 8). No serious adverse events or safety concerns occurred among the study participants.

conclusionsMM-based intervention is feasible, acceptable, and safe in opioid-treated CLBP.

Indexed as

MeditationMindfulnessAdultAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID27267151
PMCPMC4991566
OpenAlexW2409598910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.