Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27266979›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2017

Incidence of Achalasia in South Australia Based on Esophageal Manometry Findings.

Jaime A Duffield, Peter W Hamer, Richard Heddle, Richard H Holloway, Jennifer C Myers, Sarah K Thompson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Achalasia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  14. Type II Achalasia Is Increasing in Prevalence.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Possible new endoscopic finding in patients with achalasia: "Gingko leaf sign".Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jaime A DuffieldProfessorial Unit of Oesophagogastric Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Peter W HamerProfessorial Unit of Oesophagogastric Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Richard HeddleOesophageal Function Laboratory, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia.
Richard H HollowayDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jennifer C MyersProfessorial Unit of Oesophagogastric Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Sarah K ThompsonProfessorial Unit of Oesophagogastric Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Electronic address: sarah.thompson@adelaide.edu.au.
University of Adelaide · AURoyal Adelaide Hospital · AURepatriation General Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsAchalasia is a disorder of esophageal motility with a reported incidence of 0.5 to 1.6 per 100,000 persons per year in Europe, Asia, Canada, and America. However, estimates of incidence values have been derived predominantly from retrospective searches of databases of hospital discharge codes and personal communications with gastroenterologists, and are likely to be incorrect. We performed a cohort study based on esophageal manometry findings to determine the incidence of achalasia in South Australia.

methodsWe collected data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics on the South Australian population. Cases of achalasia diagnosed by esophageal manometry were identified from the 3 adult manometry laboratory databases in South Australia. Endoscopy reports and case notes were reviewed for correlations with diagnoses. The annual incidence of achalasia in the South Australian population was calculated for the decade 2004 to 2013. Findings were standardized to those of the European Standard Population based on age.

resultsThe annual incidence of achalasia in South Australia ranged from 2.3 to 2.8 per 100,000 persons. The mean age at diagnosis was 62.1 ± 18.1 years. The incidence of achalasia increased with age (Spearman rho, 0.95; P < .01). The age-standardized incidence ranged from 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8-2.3) to 2.5 (95% CI, 2.2-2.7).

conclusionsBased on a cohort study of esophageal manometry, we determined the incidence of achalasia in South Australia to be 2.3 to 2.8 per 100,000 persons and to increase with age. South Australia's relative geographic isolation and the population's access to manometry allowed for more accurate identification of cases than hospital code analyses, with a low probability of missed cases.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCohort StudiesEsophageal AchalasiaFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleManometryMiddle AgedSouth AustraliaYoung AdultAchalasiaEsophagusIncidenceManometry

Identifiers

PMID27266979
OpenAlexW2416413372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.