Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27266873›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Estimating micro area behavioural risk factor prevalence from large population-based surveys: a full Bayesian approach.

L Seliske, T A Norwood, J R McLaughlin, S Wang, C Palleschi, E Holowaty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L SeliskeAnalytics & Informatics, Cancer Care Ontario, 620 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2L7, Canada. laura.seliske@cancercare.on.ca.
T A NorwoodAnalytics & Informatics, Cancer Care Ontario, 620 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2L7, Canada.
J R McLaughlinDalla Lana School of Public Health, Health Sciences Building, 155 College Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
S WangDalla Lana School of Public Health, Health Sciences Building, 155 College Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
C PalleschiLambton Public Health, 160 Exmouth Street, Point Edward, ON, N7T 7ZT, Canada.
E HolowatyDalla Lana School of Public Health, Health Sciences Building, 155 College Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn important public health goal is to decrease the prevalence of key behavioural risk factors, such as tobacco use and obesity. Survey information is often available at the regional level, but heterogeneity within large geographic regions cannot be assessed. Advanced spatial analysis techniques are demonstrated to produce sensible micro area estimates of behavioural risk factors that enable identification of areas with high prevalence.

methodsA spatial Bayesian hierarchical model was used to estimate the micro area prevalence of current smoking and excess bodyweight for the Erie-St. Clair region in southwestern Ontario. Estimates were mapped for male and female respondents of five cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). The micro areas were 2006 Census Dissemination Areas, with an average population of 400-700 people. Two individual-level models were specified: one controlled for survey cycle and age group (model 1), and one controlled for survey cycle, age group and micro area median household income (model 2). Post-stratification was used to derive micro area behavioural risk factor estimates weighted to the population structure. SaTScan analyses were conducted on the granular, postal-code level CCHS data to corroborate findings of elevated prevalence.

resultsCurrent smoking was elevated in two urban areas for both sexes (Sarnia and Windsor), and an additional small community (Chatham) for males only. Areas of excess bodyweight were prevalent in an urban core (Windsor) among males, but not females. Precision of the posterior post-stratified current smoking estimates was improved in model 2, as indicated by narrower credible intervals and a lower coefficient of variation. For excess bodyweight, both models had similar precision. Aggregation of the micro area estimates to CCHS design-based estimates validated the findings.

conclusionsThis is among the first studies to apply a full Bayesian model to complex sample survey data to identify micro areas with variation in risk factor prevalence, accounting for spatial correlation and other covariates. Application of micro area analysis techniques helps define areas for public health planning, and may be informative to surveillance and research modeling of relevant chronic disease outcomes.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBayes TheoremCensusesChildCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityOntarioBayesian methods, Micro area analysisBehavioural risk factorsSpatial epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID27266873
PMCPMC4897930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.