Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27266848›Full record

Trial reportEpidemics2016

Design and methods of a social network isolation study for reducing respiratory infection transmission: The eX-FLU cluster randomized trial.

Allison E Aiello, Amanda M Simanek, Marisa C Eisenberg, Alison R Walsh, Brian Davis, Erik Volz, Caroline Cheng, Jeanette J Rainey, Amra Uzicanin, Hongjiang Gao and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epidemics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Allison E AielloUniversity of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, United States. Electronic address: aaiello@email.unc.edu.
Amanda M SimanekJoseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Marisa C EisenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan-School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Alison R WalshDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan-School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Brian DavisDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan-School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Erik VolzImperial College, London, UK.
Caroline ChengDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan-School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Jeanette J RaineyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Amra UzicaninCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Hongjiang GaoCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Nathaniel OsgoodUniversity of Saskatchewan, Department of Computer Science, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Dylan KnowlesUniversity of Saskatchewan, Department of Computer Science, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Kevin StanleyUniversity of Saskatchewan, Department of Computer Science, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Kara TarterDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan-School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Arnold S MontoDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan-School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAImperial College London · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Reducing Transmission of Influenza by Face MasksU01CI000441 · CI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MONTO, ARNOLD S · 2006 to 2008
$2.4M
Medical Research Council MR/K010174/1NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000185NCPDCID CDC HHS U01 CI000441NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial networks are increasingly recognized as important points of intervention, yet relatively few intervention studies of respiratory infection transmission have utilized a network design. Here we describe the design, methods, and social network structure of a randomized intervention for isolating respiratory infection cases in a university setting over a 10-week period. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findings590 students in six residence halls enrolled in the eX-FLU study during a chain-referral recruitment process from September 2012-January 2013. Of these, 262 joined as "seed" participants, who nominated their social contacts to join the study, of which 328 "nominees" enrolled. Participants were cluster-randomized by 117 residence halls. Participants were asked to respond to weekly surveys on health behaviors, social interactions, and influenza-like illness (ILI) symptoms. Participants were randomized to either a 3-Day dorm room isolation intervention or a control group (no isolation) upon illness onset. ILI cases reported on their isolation behavior during illness and provided throat and nasal swab specimens at onset, day-three, and day-six of illness. A subsample of individuals (N=103) participated in a sub-study using a novel smartphone application, iEpi, which collected sensor and contextually-dependent survey data on social interactions. Within the social network, participants were significantly positively assortative by intervention group, enrollment type, residence hall, iEpi participation, age, gender, race, and alcohol use (all P<0.002). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We identified a feasible study design for testing the impact of isolation from social networks in a university setting. These data provide an unparalleled opportunity to address questions about isolation and infection transmission, as well as insights into social networks and behaviors among college-aged students. Several important lessons were learned over the course of this project, including feasible isolation durations, the need for extensive organizational efforts, as well as the need for specialized programmers and server space for managing survey and smartphone data.

Indexed as

Patient IsolationSocial BehaviorAdolescentCluster AnalysisContact TracingFemaleHealth BehaviorHousingHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultInfluenzaIsolationRespiratory infectionSocial distancingSocial network

Identifiers

PMID27266848
PMCPMC4903923
OpenAlexW2276880565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.