Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27266769›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Default options in advance directives: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.

Nicole B Gabler, Elizabeth Cooney, Dylan S Small, Andrea B Troxel, Robert M Arnold, Douglas B White, Derek C Angus, George Loewenstein, Kevin G Volpp, Cindy L Bryce and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02017548 (Default Options in Advance Directives), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02017548 nacompletednot on this map

Default Options in Advance Directives

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2014 to 2016Enrolled270ConditionsThis Study Will Focus on Advance Care Planning Among Patients With Life-limiting IllnessesArmsLife-extension default advance directive, Comfort default advance directive
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole B GablerFostering Improvement in End-of-Life Decision Science (FIELDS) Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Elizabeth CooneyFostering Improvement in End-of-Life Decision Science (FIELDS) Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dylan S SmallDepartment of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Andrea B TroxelCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Robert M ArnoldUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Douglas B WhiteUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Derek C AngusUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
George LoewensteinCenter for Behavioral Decision Research, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kevin G VolppDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Fostering Improvement in End-of-Life Decision Science (FIELDS) Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cindy L BryceUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Scott D HalpernDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Fostering Improvement in End-of-Life Decision Science (FIELDS) Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USDecision Research · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert H. Vonderheide · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
The Penn Roybal Center on Behavioral Economics and Health: Solving for Scale and Impact with Design Thinking, Digital Platforms, and Dynamic AdaptationP30AG034546 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Alison Meredith Buttenheim, KEVIN G VOLPP · 2009 to 2026
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NIA NIH HHS P30 AG034546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough most seriously ill Americans wish to avoid burdensome and aggressive care at the end of life, such care is often provided unless patients or family members specifically request otherwise. Advance directives (ADs) were created to provide opportunities to set limits on aggressive care near life's end. This study tests the hypothesis that redesigning ADs such that comfort-oriented care is provided as the default, rather than requiring patients to actively choose it, will promote better patient-centred outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre trial randomises seriously ill adults to receive 1 of 3 different ADs: (1) a traditional AD that requires patients to actively choose their goals of care or preferences for specific interventions (eg, feeding tube insertion) or otherwise have their care guided by their surrogates and the prevailing societal default toward aggressive care; (2) an AD that defaults to life-extending care and receipt of life-sustaining interventions, enabling patients to opt out from such care; or (3) an AD that defaults to comfort care, enabling patients to opt into life-extending care. We seek to enrol 270 patients who return complete, legally valid ADs so as to generate sufficient power to detect differences in the primary outcome of hospital-free days (days alive and not in an acute care facility). Secondary outcomes include hospital and intensive care unit admissions, costs of care, hospice usage, decision conflict and satisfaction, quality of life, concordance of preferences with care received and bereavement outcomes for surrogates of patients who die. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Boards at all trial centres, and is guided by a data safety and monitoring board and an ethics advisory board. Study results will be disseminated using methods that describe the results in ways that key stakeholders can best understand and implement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02017548; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdolescentAdultAdvance DirectivesAgedAged, 80 and overFamilyFemaleHospice CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionPatient ComfortQuality of LifeAdvance directiveDefault optionRandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID27266769
PMCPMC4908890
OpenAlexW2412204690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.