ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging2016
Cognitive Machine-Learning Algorithm for Cardiac Imaging: A Pilot Study for Differentiating Constrictive Pericarditis From Restrictive Cardiomyopathy.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: An Umbrella Review of Applications and Translational Challenges.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Pooled it
- Big Data in cardiac surgery: real world and perspectives.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Ultrasound: Clinical Applications, Foundation Models, and the Path to Precision Cardiology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Application Progress of Machine Learning in Prognostic Prediction of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2026Review
- Multimodality Imaging Approach in the Diagnosis of Constrictive Pericarditis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Perioperative and Surgical Management of Constrictive Pericarditis.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of AI-Assisted Focused Cardiac Ultrasound (FOCUS) in Primary Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Formal validation of a deep learning-based automated interpretation system for cardiac structure and function in adult echocardiography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Revolutionizing Cardiology: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction: An Updated Review on Current Understanding and Future Research.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Review
- Left Ventricular Segmentation, Warping, and Myocardial Registration for Automated Strain Measurement.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Charting the Unseen: How Non-Invasive Imaging Could Redefine Cardiovascular Prevention.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Deep learning from latent spatiotemporal information of the heart: Identifying advanced bioimaging markers from echocardiograms.Biophysics reviews · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Differential Diagnosis of Cardiomyopathy Phenotypes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Can Artificial Intelligence Revolutionize the Diagnosis and Management of the Atrial Septal Defect in Children?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Challenges and solutions of echocardiography generalization for deep learning: a study in patients with constrictive pericarditis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Methods for Precision Cardiovascular Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Echocardiography in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Deep Learning for Echocardiography: Introduction for Clinicians and Future Vision: State-of-the-Art Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAssociating a patient's profile with the memories of prototypical patients built through previous repeat clinical experience is a key process in clinical judgment. We hypothesized that a similar process using a cognitive computing tool would be well suited for learning and recalling multidimensional attributes of speckle tracking echocardiography data sets derived from patients with known constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND
resultsClinical and echocardiographic data of 50 patients with constrictive pericarditis and 44 with restrictive cardiomyopathy were used for developing an associative memory classifier-based machine-learning algorithm. The speckle tracking echocardiography data were normalized in reference to 47 controls with no structural heart disease, and the diagnostic area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the associative memory classifier was evaluated for differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Using only speckle tracking echocardiography variables, associative memory classifier achieved a diagnostic area under the curve of 89.2%, which improved to 96.2% with addition of 4 echocardiographic variables. In comparison, the area under the curve of early diastolic mitral annular velocity and left ventricular longitudinal strain were 82.1% and 63.7%, respectively. Furthermore, the associative memory classifier demonstrated greater accuracy and shorter learning curves than other machine-learning approaches, with accuracy asymptotically approaching 90% after a training fraction of 0.3 and remaining flat at higher training fractions.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates feasibility of a cognitive machine-learning approach for learning and recalling patterns observed during echocardiographic evaluations. Incorporation of machine-learning algorithms in cardiac imaging may aid standardized assessments and support the quality of interpretations, particularly for novice readers with limited experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.