Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27266581›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of managed care2016

Breast cancer multigene testing trends and impact on chemotherapy use.

G Thomas Ray, Jeanne Mandelblatt, Laurel A Habel, Scott Ramsey, Lawrence H Kushi, Yan Li, Tracy A Lieu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of managed care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. EndoPredictBreast cancer research and treatment · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cost Effectiveness of Gene Expression Profile Testing in Community Practice.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G Thomas RayDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612. E-mail: tom.ray@kp.org.
Jeanne Mandelblatt
Laurel A Habel
Scott Ramsey
Lawrence H Kushi
Yan Li
Tracy A Lieu

Funding

The HMO Cancer Research Network (CRN)U19CA079689 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI MAZOR, KATHLEEN MICHELE · 1999 to 2011
$62.6M
Prospective Study of Breast Cancer SurvivorshipR01CA105274 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2004 to 2014
$19.9M
CRN4: Cancer Research Resources & Collaboration in Integrated Health Care SystemsU24CA171524 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2012 to 2016
$16.0M
Comparative Modeling: Informing Breast Cancer Control Practice & PolicyU01CA152958 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BERRY, DONALD A, DE KONING, HARRY J · 2010 to 2015
$7.6M
Optimizing Personalized Care Using Economic Studies of Genomic Testing: Supporting Patient-ProviderU01CA183081 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI LIEU, TRACY A, MANDELBLATT, JEANNE · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
Comparative effectiveness in genomic & personalized medicine for colon cancerUC2CA148471 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GODDARD, KATRINA A., KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2010 to 2010
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105274NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152958NCI NIH HHS U01 CA183081NCI NIH HHS U19 CA079689NCI NIH HHS U24 CA171524NCI NIH HHS UC2 CA148471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA 21-gene test that predicts recurrence risk among women with hormone receptor positive (HR+), localized breast cancer was nationally recommended in 2007, but we know little about its subsequent impact. We evaluated: a) patient characteristics associated with test use, b) correlations between Recurrence Score (RS) and chemotherapy, and c) whether test introduction was associated with a reduction in chemotherapy use. STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study.

methodsThe Kaiser Permanente Northern California tumor registry and electronic health records from 2005 to 2012 were used to identify HR+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node-negative cancers. Analyses used logistic regression with propensity score matching and 2-level logistic regression.

resultsOf the 7004 patients who met guidelines for testing, 22% were tested and 26% had chemotherapy. Test use was more likely in younger women (for ages 40-49 years vs 50-64 years: odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.44), in women with tumors sized 1.0 to 2.0 cm versus > 2 cm (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.03-1.40), and in women from higher-income neighborhoods (for each $10,000 increase in area median income: OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07). Among patients with low RS, 8% had chemotherapy versus 72% among patients with high RS (P < .01). In propensity score-matched analyses, testing was associated with an absolute reduction of 6.2% in the proportion of women receiving chemotherapy (95% CI, 2.9%-9.5%); the 2-level model showed a similar but nonsignificant (P = .14) association.

conclusionsThe 21-gene test is used in a minority of eligible patients in this integrated plan. Its use appears to be associated with a modest decrease in overall chemotherapy use.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCaliforniaCohort StudiesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedMultigene FamilyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID27266581
PMCPMC4940166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.