Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27266373›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016

Iterative reconstruction can permit the use of lower X-ray tube current in CT coronary artery calcium scoring.

Mark A Rodrigues, Michelle C Williams, Thomas Fitzgerald, Martin Connell, Nicholas W Weir, David E Newby, Edwin J R van Beek, Saeed Mirsadraee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark A Rodrigues1 Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Michelle C Williams2 British Heart Foundation/University of Edinburgh Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Thomas Fitzgerald1 Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Martin Connell3 Clinical Research Imaging Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Nicholas W Weir3 Clinical Research Imaging Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David E Newby2 British Heart Foundation/University of Edinburgh Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Edwin J R van Beek3 Clinical Research Imaging Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Saeed Mirsadraee3 Clinical Research Imaging Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective: CT coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) is additive to traditional risk factors for predicting future cardiac events but is associated with relatively high radiation doses. We assessed the feasibility of CACS radiation dose reduction using a lower tube current and iterative reconstruction (IR).

methods: Artificial noise was added to the raw data from 27 CACS studies from patients who were symptomatic to simulate lower tube current scanning (75, 50 and 25% original current). All studies were performed on the same CT scanner at 120 kVp. Data were reconstructed using filtered back projection [Quantum Denoising Software (QDS+)] and IR [adaptive iterative dose reduction three dimensional mild, standard and strong]. Agatston scores were independently measured by two readers. CACS percentile risk scores were calculated.

results: At 75, 50 and 25% tube currents, all adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) reconstructions decreased image noise relative to QDS+ (p < 0.05). All AIDR reconstructions resulted in small reductions in Agatston score relative to QDS+ at the standard tube current (p < 0.05). Agatston scores increased with QDS+ at 75, 50 and 25% tube current (p < 0.05), whereas no significant change was observed with AIDR mild at any tested tube current. No difference in the percentile risk score with AIDR mild at any tube current occurred compared with QDS+ at standard tube current (p > 0.05). Interobserver agreement for AIDR mild remained excellent even at 25% tube current (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.997).

conclusion: Up to 75% reduction in CACS tube current is feasible using AIDR mild. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: AIDR mild IR permits low tube current CACS whilst maintaining excellent intraobserver and interobserver variability and without altering risk classification.

Identifiers

PMID27266373
PMCPMC5124869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.