Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27266372›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

Bagging survival tree procedure for variable selection and prediction in the presence of nonsusceptible patients.

Cyprien Mbogning, Philippe Broët

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Survival Forests with R-Squared Splitting Rules.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cyprien MbogningUniversité Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, 14-16 Avenue Paul-Vaillant Couturier, Villejuif, 94807, France. cyprien.mbogning@inserm.fr.
Philippe BroëtUniversité Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, 14-16 Avenue Paul-Vaillant Couturier, Villejuif, 94807, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor clinical genomic studies with high-dimensional datasets, tree-based ensemble methods offer a powerful solution for variable selection and prediction taking into account the complex interrelationships between explanatory variables. One of the key component of the tree-building process is the splitting criterion. For survival data, the classical splitting criterion is the Logrank statistic. However, the presence of a fraction of nonsusceptible patients in the studied population advocates for considering a criterion tailored to this peculiar situation.

resultsWe propose a bagging survival tree procedure for variable selection and prediction where the survival tree-building process relies on a splitting criterion that explicitly focuses on time-to-event survival distribution among susceptible patients. A simulation study shows that our method achieves good performance for the variable selection and prediction. Different criteria for evaluating the importance of the explanatory variables and the prediction performance are reported. Our procedure is illustrated on a genomic dataset with gene expression measurements from early breast cancer patients.

conclusionsIn the presence of nonsusceptible patients among the studied population, our procedure represents an efficient way to select event-related explanatory covariates with potential higher-order interaction and identify homogeneous groups of susceptible patients.

Indexed as

SoftwareBreast NeoplasmsComputer SimulationDisease SusceptibilityFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateBaggingGenomicHigh-dimensional dataNonsusceptible individualsSurvival tree

Identifiers

PMID27266372
PMCPMC4895817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.