ArticleeLife2016
To branch or to expand?
Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Force-responsive biomaterials drive tissue repair by harnessing endogenous growth factors.Nature materials · 2026Article
- Regulatory feedback between VEGF and ERK pathways controls tip-cell expression during sea urchin skeletogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- RHOQ is induced by DLL4 and regulates angiogenesis by determining the intracellular route of the Notch intracellular domain.Angiogenesis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oscillating protein signals control the branching and expansion of blood vessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.