ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2016
Symptom Burden and End-of-Life Treatment Preferences in the Very Old.
Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with the initiation of chemotherapy within 90 days of death in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Understanding End-of-Life Preferences: Predicting Life-Prolonging Treatment Preferences Among Community-Dwelling Older Americans.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextEnd-of-life (EOL) treatment preferences among the very old (age 85+) may differ from preferences in younger aged populations because of high levels of symptom burden and disability and high risk of mortality. It is unclear if symptom burden or level of disability is more important for such preferences.
objectivesTo investigate whether distress from daily symptom burden was an independent correlate of EOL treatment preferences over two years of follow-up in people with median age 86 (participants) and 88 (reported by proxies) at baseline.
methodsThe End of Life in Very Old Age is an ancillary study to the Health, Aging and Body Composition study. At baseline in Year 15 of Health, Aging and Body Composition, 1038 participants and 189 proxies reported levels of symptom distress every quarter, as well as 0-8 EOL treatment preferences elicited once each year.
resultsAt baseline, the mean (SD) count of EOL treatment preferences was 4.2 (2.1) in participants, and 2.9 (2.3) in proxies. EOL treatment preference was not associated with symptom distress. By contrast, black race, male gender, and reported ease walking a quarter mile were independently associated with more aggressive EOL treatment preferences.
conclusionPreferences for more aggressive EOL treatment were not related to daily symptom distress but were significantly more likely to be endorsed among those with better mobility, suggesting that disability is an independent predictor of EOL treatment preferences in the very old.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.