Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27265614›Full record

ReviewJournal of structural biology2016

Membrane remodelling in bacteria.

Olga Bohuszewicz, Jiwei Liu, Harry H Low

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of structural biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. In situ NMR reveals a pH sensor motif in an outer membrane protein that drives bacterial vesicle production.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Advances in the study of the relationship betweenFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Experimental evolution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olga BohuszewiczDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Jiwei LiuDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Harry H LowDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK. Electronic address: h.low@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 1520968Wellcome Trust 097328Wellcome Trust 097328/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In bacteria the ability to remodel membrane underpins basic cell processes such as growth, and more sophisticated adaptations like inter-cell crosstalk, organelle specialisation, and pathogenesis. Here, selected examples of membrane remodelling in bacteria are presented and the diverse mechanisms for inducing membrane fission, fusion, and curvature discussed. Compared to eukaryotes, relatively few curvature-inducing proteins have been characterised so far. Whilst it is likely that many such proteins remain to be discovered, it also reflects the importance of alternative membrane remodelling strategies in bacteria where passive mechanisms for generating curvature are utilised.

Indexed as

BacteriaMembrane ProteinsMembranesMembrane ProteinsBacteriaCurvature-inducing proteinMembraneRemodellingVesicle

Identifiers

PMID27265614
PMCPMC6168058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.