Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27265373›Full record

ArticleClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2016

Prevalence of rhinoviruses in young children of an unselected birth cohort from the Netherlands.

J G Wildenbeest, M P van der Schee, S Hashimoto, K S M Benschop, R P Minnaar, A B Sprikkelman, E G Haarman, W M C van Aalderen, P J Sterk, D Pajkrt and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Molecular Epidemiology and Clinical Phylogenetics of Rhinoviruses Among Paediatric Cases in Sydney, Australia.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  16. Enhanced Neutralizing Antibody Responses to Rhinovirus C and Age-Dependent Patterns of Infection.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Respiratory pathogens and clinical outcomes in children with an asthma exacerbation: A systematic review.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2019
    Review
  20. Rhinovirus and Asthma Exacerbations.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J G WildenbeestDepartment of Paediatric Haematology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Emma's Children Hospital, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Microbiology, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.g.wildenbeest@amc.uva.nl.
M P van der ScheeDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Emma's Children Hospital, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Paediatric Pulmonology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S HashimotoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
K S M BenschopDepartment of Medical Microbiology, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R P MinnaarDepartment of Medical Microbiology, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A B SprikkelmanDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Emma's Children Hospital, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E G HaarmanDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Emma's Children Hospital, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Paediatric Pulmonology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W M C van AalderenDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Emma's Children Hospital, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P J SterkDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D PajkrtDepartment of Paediatric Haematology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Emma's Children Hospital, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
K C WolthersDepartment of Medical Microbiology, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhinovirus (RV) is a frequent pathogen in young children, eliciting symptoms ranging from common colds to wheezing illnesses and lower respiratory tract infections. The recently identified RV-C seems to be associated with asthma exacerbations and more severe disease, but results vary. We studied the prevalence and severity of infection with RV in an unselected birth cohort. Children with respiratory symptoms entered the symptomatic arm of the cohort and were compared with asymptomatic children. Severity of wheezing and other respiratory symptoms was registered. Respiratory viruses were evaluated using throat and nasopharyngeal swabs on first presentation and after recovery (wheezing children). RV genotyping was performed on RV-PCR positive samples. RV was the most prevalent respiratory virus and was found in 58/140 symptomatic children (41%), 24/96 (25%) control children and 19/74 (26%) wheezing symptomatic children after recovery (p <0.05) and did not differ between wheezing and non-wheezing symptomatic children-respectively, 42% (38/90) and 40% (20/50). RV-A was the most commonly detected species (40/68, 59%), followed by RV-C (22/68, 32%) and RV-B (6/68, 9%). RV-B was more frequently detected in asymptomatic children (5/6, p <0.05). There was no significant difference in the frequency of RV species between wheezing and non-wheezing symptomatic children. Children with RV mono-infection had more severe symptoms, but no association between RV species and severity of disease was seen. In an unselected birth cohort from the Netherlands with mild respiratory disease RV was the most prevalent respiratory virus. RV(-C) infection was not associated with more severe disease or wheezing.

Indexed as

RhinovirusBacterial InfectionsCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCoinfectionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMaleNetherlandsPicornaviridae InfectionsPrevalenceSeasonsSeverity of Illness IndexChildrenRhinovirusRV type CUnselected birth cohortWheezing

Identifiers

PMID27265373
PMCPMC7128250
OpenAlexW2411430551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.