ReviewDNA repair2016
When DNA repair goes wrong: BER-generated DNA-protein crosslinks to oxidative lesions.
Review in DNA repair, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- HMCES corrupts replication fork stability during base excision repair in homologous recombination-deficient cells.Science advances · 2025Article
- SPRTN metalloprotease participates in repair of ROS-mediated DNA-protein crosslinks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Functional roles and cancer variants of the bifunctional glycosylase NEIL2.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2024Review
- Base Excision Repair: Mechanisms and Impact in Biology, Disease, and Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- RNA polymerase pausing, stalling and bypass during transcription of damaged DNA: from molecular basis to functional consequences.Nucleic acids research · 2022Review
- DNA-protein crosslinks are repaired via homologous recombination in mammalian mitochondria.DNA repair · 2021Article
- Mild phenotype of knockouts of the major apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease APEX1 in a non-cancer human cell line.PloS one · 2021Article
- DNA-protein crosslinks from environmental exposure: Mechanisms of formation and repair.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2020Review
- New insights into abasic site repair and tolerance.DNA repair · 2020Review
- Requirements for PARP-1 covalent crosslinking to DNA (PARP-1 DPC).DNA repair · 2020Review
- The DNA repair enzyme MUTYH potentiates cytotoxicity of the alkylating agent MNNG by interacting with abasic sites.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Article
- Oxidative DNA-protein crosslinks formed in mammalian cells by abasic site lyases involved in DNA repair.DNA repair · 2020Article
- Participation of TDP1 in the repair of formaldehyde-induced DNA-protein cross-links in chicken DT40 cells.PloS one · 2020Article
- Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterase I N-Terminal Domain Modifications and Interactions Regulate Cellular Function.Genes · 2019Review
- Repair pathway for PARP-1 DNA-protein crosslinks.DNA repair · 2019Article
- Article
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Tools to Characterize DNA-Protein Cross-Linking by Bis-Electrophiles.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2017Review
- Risky repair: DNA-protein crosslinks formed by mitochondrial base excision DNA repair enzymes acting on free radical lesions.Free radical biology & medicine · 2017Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Free radicals generate an array of DNA lesions affecting all parts of the molecule. The damage to deoxyribose receives less attention than base damage, even though the former accounts for ∼20% of the total. Oxidative deoxyribose fragments (e.g., 3'-phosphoglycolate esters) are removed by the Ape1 AP endonuclease and other enzymes in mammalian cells to enable DNA repair synthesis. Oxidized abasic sites are initially incised by Ape1, thus recruiting these lesions into base excision repair (BER) pathways. Lesions such as 2-deoxypentos-4-ulose can be removed by conventional (single-nucleotide) BER, which proceeds through a covalent Schiff base intermediate with DNA polymerase β (Polβ) that is resolved by hydrolysis. In contrast, the lesion 2-deoxyribonolactone (dL) must be processed by multinucleotide ("long-patch") BER: attempted repair via the single-nucleotide pathway leads to a dead-end, covalent complex with Polβ cross- linked to the DNA by an amide bond. We recently detected these stable DNA-protein crosslinks (DPC) between Polβ and dL in intact cells. The features of the DPC formation in vivo are exactly in keeping with the mechanistic properties seen in vitro: Polβ-DPC are formed by oxidative agents in line with their ability to form the dL lesion; they are not formed by non-oxidative agents; DPC formation absolutely requires the active-site lysine-72 that attacks the 5'-deoxyribose; and DPC formation depends on Ape1 to incise the dL lesion first. The Polβ-DPC are rapidly processed in vivo, the signal disappearing with a half-life of 15-30min in both mouse and human cells. This removal is blocked by inhibiting the proteasome, which leads to the accumulation of ubiquitin associated with the Polβ-DPC. While other proteins (e.g., topoisomerases) also form DPC under these conditions, 60-70% of the trapped ubiquitin depends on Polβ. The mechanism of ubiquitin targeting to Polβ-DPC, the subsequent processing of the expected 5'-peptidyl-dL, and the biological consequences of unrepaired DPC are important to assess. Many other lyase enzymes that attack dL can also be trapped in DPC, so the processing mechanisms may apply quite broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.