Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27264028›Full record

ArticleVision research2016

Peripheral contrast sensitivity and attention in myopia.

Kristen L Kerber, Frank Thorn, Peter J Bex, Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Motion Misperception in Anisomyopia Before and After Optical Correction.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Defective Temporal Window of the Foveal Visual Processing in High Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Secondary diseases in high myopia].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristen L KerberNew England College of Optometry, 424 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Frank ThornNew England College of Optometry, 424 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Peter J BexNortheastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Fuensanta A Vera-DiazNew England College of Optometry, 424 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02115, United States. Electronic address: Vera_DiazF@neco.edu.
New England College of Optometry · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

SHORT TERM RES TRAINING AT THE NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OFT35EY007149 · NEI · NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI Athanasios Panorgias · 1999 to 2026
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS L30 EY021931NEI NIH HHS T35 EY007149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disruption of normal visual experience or changes in the normal interaction between central and peripheral retinal input may lead to the development of myopia. In order to examine the relationship between peripheral contrast sensitivity and myopia, we manipulated attentional load for foveal vision in emmetropes and myopes while observers detected targets with peripheral vision. Peripheral contrast detection thresholds were measured binocularly using vertical Gabor stimuli presented at three eccentricities (±8°, 17°, 30°) in a spatial 2 alternative forced choice task. Contrast thresholds were measured in young adult (mean age 24.5±2.6years) emmetropes (n=17; group SE: +0.19±0.32D) and myopes (n=25; group SE: -3.74±1.99D). Attention at central fixation was manipulated with: (1) a low attention task, requiring simple fixation; or (2) a high attention task, which required subjects to perform a mathematical task. We found that at 30° all subjects exhibited lower contrast sensitivity (higher thresholds). In addition, myopes (Wilcoxon, p<0.01), but not emmetropes (Wilcoxon, p=0.1), had a significant decrease in sensitivity at 30° during the high attention task. However, the attention dependent threshold increase for myopes was not significantly greater than for emmetropes (Wilcoxon, p=0.27). Attentional load did not increase thresholds at 8° or 17° for either refractive group. These data indicate that myopes experience a greater decrease in contrast sensitivity in the far periphery than emmetropes when attention is deployed in central vision.

Indexed as

AttentionAdultContrast SensitivityEmmetropiaFemaleHumansMaleMyopiaSensory ThresholdsVision, BinocularYoung AdultAttentionContrastEmmetropizationMyopiaPeripherySensitivity

Identifiers

PMID27264028
PMCPMC5379850
OpenAlexW2410116987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.