Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27263997›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2016

Impact on family and parental stress of prenatal vs postnatal repair of myelomeningocele.

Ryan M Antiel, N Scott Adzick, Elizabeth A Thom, Pamela K Burrows, Diana L Farmer, John W Brock, Lori J Howell, Jody A Farrell, Amy J Houtrow, Management of Myelomeningocele Study Investigators

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00060606 (Myelomeningocele Repair Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00060606 nacompletednot on this map

Myelomeningocele Repair Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe George Washington University Biostatistics CenterRan2003 to 2017Enrolled183ConditionsMeningomyelocele, Spinal DysraphismArmsPrenatal Myelomeningocele Repair Surgery, Postnatal Myelomeningocele Repair Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Family dynamics after diagnosis and surgical treatment of myelomeningocele: using telemedicine as a complementary tool.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Review
  7. Implementation ofAJOG global reports · 2025
    Article
  8. The Intrauterine Treatment of Open Spinal Dysraphism.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. "We want to do everything": how parents represent their experiences with maternal-fetal surgery online.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan M AntielCenter for Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
N Scott AdzickCenter for Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Elizabeth A ThomBiostatistics Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Pamela K BurrowsBiostatistics Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Diana L FarmerDepartments of Pediatrics and Surgery, and University of California-San Francisco Fetal Treatment Center, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, CA.
John W BrockDepartments of Urology and Pediatric Surgery/Fetal Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Lori J HowellCenter for Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Jody A FarrellDepartments of Pediatrics and Surgery, and University of California-San Francisco Fetal Treatment Center, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Amy J HoutrowDepartment of Physical Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: houtrow@upmc.edu.
Management of Myelomeningocele Study Investigators
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USGeorge Washington University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Myelomeningocele Repair Randomized Trial (U01-HD41665)U01HD041665 · NICHD · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI THOM, ELIZABETH ANN · 2002 to 2010
$7.4M
A Follow-up of Children Enrolled in the Management of Myelomeningocele StudyU01HD068541 · NICHD · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ADZICK, N SCOTT, BROCK, JOHN W. · 2011 to 2015
$6.7M
MULTICENTER TRIAL OF FETAL MYELOMENINGOCELE REPAIRU10HD041669 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FARMER, DIANA LEE · 2002 to 2010
$5.5M
Multicenter Trial of Fetal Myelomeningocele RepairU10HD041667 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BROCK, JOHN W. · 2002 to 2010
$3.5M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD041665NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD068541NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041667NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Management of Myelomeningocele Study was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial that compared prenatal repair with standard postnatal repair for fetal myelomeningocele.

objectiveWe sought to describe the long-term impact on the families of the women who participated and to evaluate how the timing of repair influenced the impact on families and parental stress. STUDY

designRandomized women completed the 24-item Impact on Family Scale and the 36-item Parenting Stress Index Short Form at 12 and 30 months after delivery. A revised 15-item Impact on Family Scale describing overall impact was also computed. Higher scores reflected more negative impacts or greater stress. In addition, we examined Family Support Scale and Family Resource Scale scores along with various neonatal outcomes. Repeated measures analysis was conducted for each scale and subscale.

resultsOf 183 women randomized, 171 women completed the Impact on Family Scale and 172 completed the Parenting Stress Index at both 12 and 30 months. The prenatal surgery group had significantly lower revised 15-item Impact on Family Scale scores as well as familial-social impact subscale scores compared to the postnatal surgery group (P = .02 and .004, respectively). There was no difference in total parental stress between the 2 groups (P = .89) or in any of the Parenting Stress Index Short Form subscales. In addition, walking independently at 30 months and family resources at 12 months were associated with both family impact and parental stress.

conclusionThe overall negative family impact of caring for a child with spina bifida, up to 30 months of age, was significantly lower in the prenatal surgery group compared to the postnatal surgery group. Ambulation status and family resources were predictive of impact on family and parental stress.

Indexed as

AdultCaregiversChild, PreschoolFemaleFetusGestational AgeHumansInfantMeningomyeloceleParentsPostnatal CareRisk FactorsStress, Psychologicalfamily impactmaternal-fetal surgerymyelomeningoceleparental stressspina bifida

Identifiers

PMID27263997
PMCPMC5045772
OpenAlexW2301159137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.