Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27263968›Full record

ArticleNeuron2016

Synaptic Rectification Controls Nonlinear Spatial Integration of Natural Visual Inputs.

Maxwell H Turner, Fred Rieke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Natural motion statistics unify direction computations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Distinct system-level computations underlie perceptual variation across the visual field.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Origin and functional impact of early nonlinearities in primate retina.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Diversity of Ganglion Cell Responses to Saccade-Like Image Shifts in the Primate Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maxwell H TurnerDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Fred RiekeDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: rieke@uw.edu.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32EY007031 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Wyeth Daniel Bair, Anitha Pasupathy · 1985 to 2026
$6.1M
BIOPHYSICAL MECHANISMS OF SINGLE PHOTON DETECTIONR01EY011850 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RIEKE, FREDERICK M · 1997 to 2015
$3.5M
Retinal ganglion cell receptive field form and function during natural viewingF31EY026288 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI TURNER, MAXWELL HOLTE · 2016 to 2017
$62k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS F31 EY026288NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011850NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central goal in the study of any sensory system is to predict neural responses to complex inputs, especially those encountered during natural stimulation. Nowhere is the transformation from stimulus to response better understood than the vertebrate retina. Nevertheless, descriptions of retinal computation are largely based on stimulation using artificial visual stimuli, and it is unclear how these descriptions map onto the encoding of natural stimuli. We demonstrate that nonlinear spatial integration, a common feature of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) processing, shapes neural responses to natural visual stimuli in primate Off parasol RGCs, whereas On parasol RGCs exhibit surprisingly linear spatial integration. Despite this asymmetry, both cell types show strong nonlinear integration when presented with artificial stimuli. We show that nonlinear integration of natural stimuli is a consequence of rectified excitatory synaptic input and that accounting for nonlinear spatial integration substantially improves models that predict RGC responses to natural images.

Indexed as

AnimalsMacacaModels, NeurologicalNonlinear DynamicsPhotic StimulationRetinal Ganglion CellsSynapsesVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID27263968
PMCPMC4917290
OpenAlexW2415703368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.