Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27263509›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2016

Neuronal generator patterns at scalp elicited by lateralized aversive pictures reveal consecutive stages of motivated attention.

Jürgen Kayser, Craig E Tenke, Karen S Abraham, Daniel M Alschuler, Jorge E Alvarenga, Jamie Skipper, Virginia Warner, Gerard E Bruder, Myrna M Weissman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jürgen KayserDivision of Cognitive Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: kayserj@nyspi.columbia.edu.
Craig E TenkeDivision of Cognitive Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States.
Karen S AbrahamDivision of Cognitive Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.
Daniel M AlschulerDivision of Cognitive Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.
Jorge E AlvarengaDivision of Cognitive Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.
Jamie SkipperDivision of Epidemiology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.
Virginia WarnerDivision of Epidemiology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States; Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Gerard E BruderDivision of Cognitive Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States.
Myrna M WeissmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States; Division of Epidemiology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States; Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

Three Generations at High and Low Risk for Depression Followed LongitudinallyR01MH036197 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POSNER, JONATHAN E, WEISSMAN, MYRNA M · 1985 to 2020
$15.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH036197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Event-related potential (ERP) studies have provided evidence for an allocation of attentional resources to enhance perceptual processing of motivationally salient stimuli. Emotional modulation affects several consecutive components associated with stages of affective-cognitive processing, beginning as early as 100-200ms after stimulus onset. In agreement with the notion that the right parietotemporal region is critically involved during the perception of arousing affective stimuli, some ERP studies have reported asymmetric emotional ERP effects. However, it is difficult to separate emotional from non-emotional effects because differences in stimulus content unrelated to affective salience or task demands may also be associated with lateralized function or promote cognitive processing. Other concerns pertain to the operational definition and statistical independence of ERP component measures, their dependence on an EEG reference, and spatial smearing due to volume conduction, all of which impede the identification of distinct scalp activation patterns associated with affective processing. Building on prior research using a visual half-field paradigm with highly controlled emotional stimuli (pictures of cosmetic surgery patients showing disordered [negative] or healed [neutral] facial areas before or after treatment), 72-channel ERPs recorded from 152 individuals (ages 13-68years; 81 female) were transformed into reference-free current source density (CSD) waveforms and submitted to temporal principal components analysis (PCA) to identify their underlying neuronal generator patterns. Using both nonparametric randomization tests and repeated measures ANOVA, robust effects of emotional content were found over parietooccipital regions for CSD factors corresponding to N2 sink (212ms peak latency), P3 source (385ms) and a late centroparietal source (630ms), all indicative of greater positivity for negative than neutral stimuli. For the N2 sink, emotional effects were right-lateralized and modulated by hemifield, with larger amplitude and asymmetry for left hemifield (right hemisphere) presentations. For all three factors, more positive amplitudes at parietooccipital sites were associated with increased ratings of negative valence and greater arousal. Distributed inverse solutions of the CSD-PCA-based emotional effects implicated a sequence of maximal activations in right occipitotemporal cortex, bilateral posterior cingulate cortex, and bilateral inferior temporal cortex. These findings are consistent with hierarchical activations of the ventral visual pathway reflecting subsequent processing stages in response to motivationally salient stimuli.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdolescentAdultAgedAttentionCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEmotionsEvoked PotentialsFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPattern Recognition, VisualCurrent source density (CSD)Emotional lateralizationEvent-related potential (ERP)Late positive potential (LPP)Principal components analysis (PCA)Source localization

Identifiers

PMID27263509
PMCPMC5135657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.