Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27263020›Full record

Observational studyPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2016

Mycophenolate mofetil in steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.

Laurène Dehoux, Julien Hogan, Claire Dossier, Marc Fila, Olivier Niel, Anne Maisin, Marie Alice Macher, Thérésa Kwon, Véronique Baudouin, Georges Deschênes

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Treating the idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: are steroids the answer?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laurène DehouxDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Hôpital Robert Debré, APHP, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75935, Paris, Cedex 19, France. laurene.dehoux@aphp.fr.
Julien HoganDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Hôpital Robert Debré, APHP, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75935, Paris, Cedex 19, France.
Claire DossierDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Hôpital Robert Debré, APHP, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75935, Paris, Cedex 19, France.
Marc FilaDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Hôpital Robert Debré, APHP, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75935, Paris, Cedex 19, France.
Olivier NielDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Hôpital Robert Debré, APHP, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75935, Paris, Cedex 19, France.
Anne MaisinDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Hôpital Robert Debré, APHP, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75935, Paris, Cedex 19, France.
Marie Alice MacherDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Hôpital Robert Debré, APHP, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75935, Paris, Cedex 19, France.
Thérésa KwonDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Hôpital Robert Debré, APHP, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75935, Paris, Cedex 19, France.
Véronique BaudouinDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Hôpital Robert Debré, APHP, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75935, Paris, Cedex 19, France.
Georges DeschênesDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Hôpital Robert Debré, APHP, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75935, Paris, Cedex 19, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Robert-Debré · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProspective studies have established the mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) efficiency in childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) but reports on the long-term outcome are lacking. Moreover, the search for factors influencing its efficiency would be useful to define its place among the other treatments.

methodsWe performed a monocentric retrospective study including 96 children with steroid-dependent INS followed for 4.7 years (median) (IQ 3-6) after the onset of MMF treatment. The characteristics of responder patients (n = 74), as defined by a 50 % decrease of relapse rate and/or a 60 % decrease of steroid dose, and of non-responder patients (n = 22) were compared by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.

resultsWithdrawal of prednisone was achieved in 48/96 patients after a median duration of 18.1 months (IQ 7.8-30.0) of MMF. Only 26/48 patients did not relapse under MMF alone. After MMF was stopped in these patients, only six remained in remission without any treatment at last follow-up. Responders had a shorter time to remission at the first flare (9.5 vs. 15 days, p = 0.02), a shorter disease duration prior to the onset of MMF (22.2 vs. 94.5 months, p = 0.001), and were younger at the MMF initiation (6.7 vs. 10.1 years, p = 0.02) than non-responder patients. The age of MMF initiation was an independent factor associated with efficiency (OR = 0.80, 95 % CI [0.69, 0.93], p < 0.01).

conclusionsMMF is more efficient in young patients treated early in the disease course. Nevertheless, MMF has no remnant effect while nearly all patients relapsed after withdrawal of the drug.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalChildChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMycophenolic AcidNephrotic SyndromePrednisoneRecurrenceAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic AcidPrednisoneChildMinimal change diseasePrednisoneProteinuriaRelapse

Identifiers

PMID27263020
OpenAlexW2419395999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.