Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27262896›Full record

ArticleClinical colorectal cancer2016

Pancreas Adenocarcinoma: Ascites, Clinical Manifestations, and Management Implications.

Angel Mier Hicks, Joanne Chou, Marinela Capanu, Maeve A Lowery, Kenneth H Yu, Eileen M O'Reilly

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical colorectal cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prognostic Impact of Minimal Pelvic Fluid in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. RadioactiveWorld journal of clinical cases · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. RadioactiveWorld journal of clinical cases · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angel Mier HicksDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center Program, New York, NY.
Joanne ChouDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Marinela CapanuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Maeve A LoweryDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Kenneth H YuDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Eileen M O'ReillyDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: oreillye@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSt. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAscites develops in a subset of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) at presentation or as the disease advances. Limited data exist on the prognostic importance of malignant ascites in PAC. Our hypothesis is that this information will provide an understanding of the natural history and facilitate management decisions.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 180 patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center diagnosed between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2014, with PAC and with ascites either at presentation or that developed during the disease course.

resultsFor the 180 patients, the overall survival was 15 months. The time from diagnosis to ascites presentation was 11 months, and the survival time after ascites development was 1.8 months (range, 1.6-2.3 months; 95% confidence interval). Of 62 patients (34%) who had ascitic fluid analyzed, 36 (58%) had positive cytology. Fifty-one (82%) patients had a serum ascites albumin gradient ≥ 1, and 11 (18%) had serum ascites albumin gradient < 1. Sixty-four (36%) patients had their ascites managed solely by serial paracenteses. A total of 116 patients required a catheter; of these, 108 (93%) had a Tenckhoff catheter, 4 (3%) a Pleurx catheter, 4 (3%) a pigtail catheter, and 1 (1%) a Denver catheter. Eight (7%) patients required 2 catheters to be placed, and in 6 (5%), Tenckhoff catheters had to be removed. The main observed complications were spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in 7 (11%) managed with paracenteses versus 26 (23%) who had a catheter placed, catheter malfunction in 8 (7%), and acute renal failure in 6 (3%). After ascites development, 79 (44%) patients received active anti-cancer therapy, and 101 (56%) patients were managed with supportive care alone.

conclusionsIn patients with PAC who presented with or developed ascites, serial paracenteses and indwelling catheters are common methods used for providing symptomatic relief. The complication rate was higher with indwelling catheters, primarily related to infection (eg, bacterial peritonitis). Overall, ascites has a significantly negative prognostic import with a short median survival.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAscitesCatheters, IndwellingCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsParacentesisPrognosisRetrospective StudiesDenver shuntMalignant ascitesPerformance statusPeritoneal catheterTeneckoff catheter

Identifiers

PMID27262896
PMCPMC5099112
OpenAlexW2352744595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.