Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27262887›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2016

Concomitant application of sprint and high-intensity interval training on maximal oxygen uptake and work output in well-trained cyclists.

Paulina Hebisz, Rafał Hebisz, Marek Zatoń, Bartosz Ochmann, Natalia Mielnik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paulina HebiszDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, 35 J.I. Paderewski Avenue, 51-612, Wroclaw, Poland. paulinahebisz@interia.pl.
Rafał HebiszDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, 35 J.I. Paderewski Avenue, 51-612, Wroclaw, Poland.
Marek ZatońDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, 35 J.I. Paderewski Avenue, 51-612, Wroclaw, Poland.
Bartosz OchmannDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, 35 J.I. Paderewski Avenue, 51-612, Wroclaw, Poland.
Natalia MielnikDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, 35 J.I. Paderewski Avenue, 51-612, Wroclaw, Poland.
University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we compared the effects of two different training modalities on maximal oxygen uptake and work output.

methodsParticipants included 26 well-trained mountain bike cyclists were divided into two groups. The first group trained using a conventional endurance protocol at steady-state (moderate) intensity and variable-intensity (high-moderate-low) free of maximal efforts. The second group combined endurance training with a sprint and high-intensity interval training protocol, which, respectively, were based on 30 s maximal repetitions and 4 min high intensity repetitions. Training duration was 8 weeks. A graded exercise test was administered pre- and post-training. Work output, oxygen uptake, minute pulmonary ventilation, heart rate and stroke volume were determined during the test.

resultsWhile work output significantly increased post-training in both groups (P < 0.05), the interval training group showed a greater magnitude of change (from 284.4 ± 91.9 to 314.2 ± 95.1 kJ) than the endurance training group (from 271.8 ± 73.3 to 283.4 ± 72.3 kJ). Significant increases in maximal oxygen uptake (from 57.9 ± 6.8 to 66.6 ± 5.3 ml kg(-1) min(-1)), maximal pulmonary ventilation and stroke volume were observed only in the interval training group.

conclusionsAn exercise protocol involving endurance and sprint and high-intensity interval training was found to induce positive effects on maximal oxygen uptake in a group of well-trained cyclists with several years athletic experience.

Indexed as

AdultAthletic PerformanceBicyclingFemaleHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionPhysical Conditioning, HumanPhysical EndurancePhysical FitnessCyclingInterval trainingMaximal oxygen uptake

Identifiers

PMID27262887
OpenAlexW2409648606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.