ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2016
Value Based Care and Patient-Centered Care: Divergent or Complementary?
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Home-based supportive care in advanced cancer: systematic review.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2024Pooled it
- Value-Based Healthcare Initiatives in Practice: A Systematic Review.Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives · 2021Pooled it
- Opportunities and challenges for the inclusion of patient preferences in the medical product life cycle: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Pooled it
- Advancing the Implementation of Patient-Centered Outcomes in Rehabilitation Learning Health Systems: Insights From the 2024 LeaRRn Summit.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Patient perspectives on cost and quality measures in value-based cancer care.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Association of Electronic Health Records Access and Coordination Between Primary Care Providers and Public Health Nurse Home Visitors in the United States.Health services research · 2025Observational
- Understanding healthcare efficiency-an AI-supported narrative review of diverse terminologies used.BMC medical education · 2025Review
- Defining nurse-led models of care: Contemporary approaches to nursing.International nursing review · 2025Review
- Toward a Clearer Understanding of Value-Based Healthcare: A Concept Analysis.Journal of nursing management · 2025Review
- Understanding Value-Based Healthcare: Qualitative Insights From Nurses and Nursing Managers in Hospital Settings.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
- Value in care: The contribution of supportive care to value-based lung cancer services-A qualitative semistructured interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Does value-based healthcare support patient-centred care? A scoping review of the evidence.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Medicare Beneficiaries' Perspectives on the Quality of Hospital Care and Their Implications for Value-Based Payment.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- It is time for a new comprehensive medication review quality measure.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2023Article
- Exploring Patient Journey Mapping and the Learning Health System: Scoping Review.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- How subjective well-being, patient-reported clinical improvement (PROMs) and experience of care (PREMs) relate in an acute psychiatric care setting?European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023Article
- The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review.PloS one · 2023Article
- Stakeholders barriers and facilitators for the implementation of a personalised digital care pathway: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Value and values.Future healthcare journal · 2022Article
- Usage of a Value-based Triaging Methodology for Assessing Improvements in Value for Hip Fracture Inpatient Episodes of Care From 2014 to 2019: A Pilot Study.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two distinct but overlapping care philosophies have emerged in cancer care: patient-centered care (PCC) and value-based care (VBC). Value in healthcare has been defined as the quality of care (measured typically by healthcare outcomes) modified by cost. In this conception of value, patient-centeredness is one important but not necessarily dominant quality measure. In contrast, PCC includes multiple domains of patient-centeredness and places the patient and family central to all decisions and evaluations of quality. The alignment of PCC and VBC is complicated by several tensions, including a relative lack of patient experience and preference measures, and conceptions of cost that are payer-focused instead of patient-focused. Several strategies may help to align these two philosophies, including the use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials and value determinations, and the purposeful integration of patient preference in clinical decisions and guidelines. Innovative models of care, including accountable care organizations and oncology patient-centered medical homes, may also facilitate alignment through improved care coordination and quality-based payment incentives. Ultimately, VBC and PCC will only be aligned if patient-centered outcomes, perspectives, and preferences are explicitly incorporated into the definitions and metrics of quality, cost, and value that will increasingly influence the delivery of cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27262855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.