ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2016
Pregnancy loss history at first parity and selected adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prenatal n-3 LC-PUFA intake and the incidence of allergic diseases in offspring: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Preconception sleep, pregnancy loss, and adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with a history of pregnancy loss.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Trial
- Geospatial Variation and Determinants of Time to Pregnancy Loss Among Reproductive-Aged Women in East Africa: Bayesian Spatial Frailty Model.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- Relationship between prior pregnancy loss and subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes in women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Trends in Risk of Pregnancy Loss Among US Women by Metropolitan Status, 2000-2018.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2025Article
- Associations between maternal abortion history and neonatal outcome among very preterm infants: a multicenter cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Article
- History of Adverse Pregnancy on Subsequent Maternal-Fetal Outcomes in Patients with Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Chinese Single Center.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Predicting the Risk of Microtia From Prenatal Factors: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Magnitude of low birthweight in malaria endemic settings of Nanoro, rural Burkina Faso: a secondary data analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Association between endometrial thickness and neonatal outcomes in intrauterine insemination cycles: a retrospective analysis of 1,016 live-born singletons.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2020Article
- Trends in Risk of Pregnancy Loss Among US Women, 1990-2011.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the association between pregnancy loss history and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
methodsPregnancy history was captured during a computer-assisted personal interview for 21,277 women surveyed in the National Survey of Family Growth (1995-2013). History of pregnancy loss (<20 weeks) at first parity was categorized in three ways: number of losses, maximum gestational age of loss(es), and recency of last pregnancy loss. We estimated risk ratios for a composite measure of selected adverse pregnancy outcomes (preterm, stillbirth, or low birthweight) at first parity and in any future pregnancy, separately, using predicted margins from adjusted logistic regression models.
resultsAt first parity, compared with having no loss, having 3+ previous pregnancy losses (adjusted risk ratio (aRR) = 1.66 [95% CI = 1.13, 2.43]), a maximum gestational age of loss(es) at ≥10 weeks (aRR = 1.28 [1.04, 1.56]) or having experienced a loss 24+ months ago (aRR = 1.36 [1.10, 1.68]) were associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. For future pregnancies, only having a history of 3+ previous pregnancy losses at first parity was associated with increased risks (aRR = 1.97 [1.08, 3.60]).
conclusionNumber, gestational age, and recency of pregnancy loss at first parity were associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in U.S. women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.