Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27262417›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2016

Malaria vaccines and human immune responses.

Carole A Long, Fidel Zavala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Are Vulnerable Communities Thoroughly Informed on Mosquito Bio-Ecology and Burden?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. A Devil of a Transmissible Cancer.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Generation of a Genetically Modified ChimericFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Proteomic Analysis ofJournal of proteome research · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carole A LongLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, 12735 Twinbrook Parkway, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Rockville, MD 20852, United States. Electronic address: clong@niaid.nih.gov.
Fidel ZavalaDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Malaria Research Institute, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.

Funding

Host Immune Responses to Antigens of Malaria ParasitesZIAAI001020 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI LONG, CAROLE · 2009 to 2025
$13.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AI999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite reductions in malaria episodes and deaths over the past decade, there is still significant need for more effective tools to combat this serious global disease. The positive results with the Phase III trial of RTS,S directed to the circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium falciparum have established that a vaccine against malaria can provide partial protection to children in endemic areas, but its limited efficacy and relatively short window of protection mandate that new generations of more efficacious vaccines must be sought. Evidence shows that anti-parasite immune responses can control infection against other stages as well, but translating these experimental findings into vaccines for blood stages has been disappointing and clinical efforts to test a transmission blocking vaccine are just beginning. Difficulties include the biological complexity of the organism with a large array of stage-specific genes many of which in the erythrocytic stages are antigenically diverse. In addition, it appears necessary to elicit high and long-lasting antibody titers, address the redundant pathways of merozoite invasion, and still seek surrogate markers of protective immunity. Most vaccine studies have focused on a single or a few antigens with an apparent functional role, but this is likely to be too restrictive, and broad, multi-antigen, multi-stage vaccines need further investigation. Finally, novel tools and biological insights involving parasite sexual stages and the mosquito vector will provide new avenues for reducing or blocking malaria transmission.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanEpitopes, T-LymphocyteErythrocytesHumansMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesPlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsSporozoitesAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, Protozoancircumsporozoite protein, ProtozoanEpitopes, T-LymphocyteMalaria VaccinesProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27262417
PMCPMC4983510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.