ReviewDNA repair2016
The democratization of gene editing: Insights from site-specific cleavage and double-strand break repair.
Review in DNA repair, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
127 citing papers in PubMed, 225 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic evaluation of the DNA repair machinery facilitated the development of efficient genome editing tools for the red yeastSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027Article
- A CRISPR-Cas9 Toolkit Enabling Tunable Integration and Transient Homologous Recombination Enhancement in Yarrowia lipolytica.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Rapid and Efficient Creation of Sweet-Waxy Maize Germplasm via CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Single-cell multiplex approaches deeply map ON-target CRISPR-genotoxicity and reveal its mitigation by palbociclib and long-term engraftment.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Synthetic lethality in cancer therapy: Mechanisms, models and clinical translation for overcoming therapeutic resistance.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Asymmetrical recognition and processing of double-strand breaks formed during DNA replication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Lack of glutamate neurotransmission in melanin-concentrating hormone neurons alters mouse reproduction and metabolism in a sex-specific manner.Biology of sex differences · 2025Article
- Breeding Wheat (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Cloning-Free Targeting of Endogenous Loci to Generate Fluorescent Reporters in Medaka.Bio-protocol · 2025Article
- Homology-arm length of donor DNA affects the impact of Msh2 loss on homologous recombination-mediated gene targeting.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Rescue of the disease-associated phenotype in CRISPR-corrected hiPSCs as a therapeutic approach for inherited retinal dystrophies.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Vinculin-Arp2/3 interaction inhibits branched actin assembly to control migration and proliferation.Life science alliance · 2025Article
- A protocol for karyotyping and genetic editing of induced pluripotent stem cells with homology-directed repair mediated CRISPR/Cas9.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- Improving the Aroma of Millets by Targeting theCurrent genomics · 2025Review
- From bench to bedside: cutting-edge applications of base editing and prime editing in precision medicine.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Comprehensive analysis of off-target and on-target effects resulting from liver-directed CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene targeting with AAV vectors.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024Article
- Exploring Advanced CRISPR Delivery Technologies for Therapeutic Genome Editing.Small science · 2024Article
67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are dangerous lesions that if not properly repaired can lead to genomic change or cell death. Organisms have developed several pathways and have many factors devoted to repairing DSBs, which broadly occurs by homologous recombination, which relies on an identical or homologous sequence to template repair, or nonhomologous end-joining. Much of our understanding of these repair mechanisms has come from the study of induced DNA cleavage by site-specific endonucleases. In addition to their biological role, these cellular pathways can be co-opted for gene editing to study gene function or for gene therapy or other applications. While the first gene editing experiments were done more than 20 years ago, the recent discovery of RNA-guided endonucleases has simplified approaches developed over the years to make gene editing an approach that is available to the entire biomedical research community. Here, we review DSB repair mechanisms and site-specific cleavage systems that have provided insight into these mechanisms and led to the current gene editing revolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.