Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27261069›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of medicine and philosophy2016

The "Ethics" Expertise in Clinical Ethics Consultation.

Ana S Iltis, Lisa M Rasmussen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of medicine and philosophy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Living ethics: a stance and its implications in health ethics.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2024
    Article
  2. Clinical Ethics Consultations and the Necessity of NOT Meeting Expectations: I Never Promised You a Rose Garden.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Place for Religious Content in Clinical Ethics Consultations: A Reply to Janet Malek.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2019
    Article
  6. Two Troubling Trends in the Conversation Over Whether Clinical Ethics Consultants Have Ethics Expertise.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ana S IltisWake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA University of North Carolina, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Lisa M RasmussenWake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA University of North Carolina, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA lrasmuss@uncc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nature, possibility, and implications of ethics expertise (or moral expertise) in general and of bioethics expertise in particular has been the focus of extensive debate for over thirty years. What is ethics expertise and what does it enable experts to do? Knowing what ethics expertise is can help answer another important question: What, if anything, makes a claim of expertise legitimate? In other words, how does someone earn the appellation "ethics expert?" There remains deep disagreement on whether ethics expertise is possible, and if so, what constitutes such expertise and what it entails and legitimates. Discussion of bioethics expertise has become particularly important given the growing presence of bioethicists in the clinical setting as well as efforts to professionalize bioethics through codes of ethics and certification (or quasi-certification) efforts. Unlike in the law or in engineering, where there may be a body of knowledge that professional organizations or others have articulated as important for education and training of experts, ethics expertise admits of no such body of knowledge or required experience. Nor is there an entity seen as having the authority to articulate the necessary scope of knowledge. Questions about whether there is such a body of knowledge for particular areas within bioethics have emerged and played a central role in professionalization efforts in recent years, especially in the area of clinical ethics.

Indexed as

BioethicsCodes of EthicsConfidentialityEthics ConsultationHumansMoral ObligationsProfessional Competencecertificationclinical ethicsethics expertiseexpertisemoral expertisemoral theoryprofessionalization

Identifiers

PMID27261069
PMCPMC4986005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.