Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27261067›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2016

Maternal immunisation with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine for prevention of influenza in infants in Mali: a prospective, active-controlled, observer-blind, randomised phase 4 trial.

Milagritos D Tapia, Samba O Sow, Boubou Tamboura, Ibrahima Tégueté, Marcela F Pasetti, Mamoudou Kodio, Uma Onwuchekwa, Sharon M Tennant, William C Blackwelder, Flanon Coulibaly and 17 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01430689 (Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Observer-Blind Trial to Measure the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine and the Safety and Immunogenicity of Quadrivalent Meningococcal Polysaccharide Diphtheria Conjugate Vaccine in Pregnant Malian Women and Their Infants up to 6 Months of Age), which is not on this map. Cited by 134 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
30.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01430689 phase4completednot on this map

Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Observer-Blind Trial to Measure the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine and the Safety and Immunogenicity of Quadrivalent Meningococcal Polysaccharide Diphtheria Conjugate Vaccine in Pregnant Malian Women and Their Infants up to 6 Months of Age

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreRan2011 to 2014Enrolled4,193ConditionsInfluenzaArmsInactivated Influenza Vaccine Trivalent Types A and B, Meningococcal Polysaccharide-Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 245 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Meningococcal Vaccination: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2020.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2020
    Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Milagritos D TapiaCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Samba O SowLe Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins du Mali (CVD-Mali), Bamako, Mali.
Boubou TambouraLe Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins du Mali (CVD-Mali), Bamako, Mali.
Ibrahima TéguetéDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Gabriel Touré, Bamako, Mali.
Marcela F PasettiCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mamoudou KodioLe Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins du Mali (CVD-Mali), Bamako, Mali.
Uma OnwuchekwaLe Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins du Mali (CVD-Mali), Bamako, Mali.
Sharon M TennantCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
William C BlackwelderCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Flanon CoulibalyLe Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins du Mali (CVD-Mali), Bamako, Mali.
Awa TraoréLe Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins du Mali (CVD-Mali), Bamako, Mali.
Adama Mamby KeitaLe Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins du Mali (CVD-Mali), Bamako, Mali.
Fadima Cheick HaidaraLe Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins du Mali (CVD-Mali), Bamako, Mali.
Fatoumata DialloLe Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins du Mali (CVD-Mali), Bamako, Mali.
Moussa DoumbiaLe Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins du Mali (CVD-Mali), Bamako, Mali.
Doh SanogoLe Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins du Mali (CVD-Mali), Bamako, Mali.
Ellen DeMattCooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Perry Point, MD, USA.
Nicholas H SchlutermanDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andrea BuchwaldDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Karen L KotloffCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Wilbur H ChenCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Evan W OrensteinEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Lauren A V OrensteinEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia PA, USA.
Julie VillanuevaNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joseph BreseeNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
John TreanorDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Myron M LevineCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: mlevine@medicine.umaryland.edu.
Centre Pour le Développement des Vaccins-Mali · MLUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USPennsylvania Hospital · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the heightened risk of serious influenza during infancy, vaccination is not recommended in infants younger than 6 months. We aimed to assess the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of maternal immunisation with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine for protection of infants against a first episode of laboratory-confirmed influenza.

methodsWe did this prospective, active-controlled, observer-blind, randomised phase 4 trial at six referral centres and community health centres in Bamako, Mali. Third-trimester pregnant women (≥28 weeks' gestation) were randomly assigned (1:1), via a computer-generated, centre-specific list with alternate block sizes of six or 12, to receive either trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine or quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine. Study personnel administering vaccines were not masked to treatment allocation, but allocation was concealed from clinicians, laboratory personnel, and participants. Infants were visited weekly until age 6 months to detect influenza-like illness; laboratory-confirmed influenza diagnosed with RT-PCR. We assessed two coprimary objectives: vaccine efficacy against laboratory-confirmed influenza in infants born to women immunised any time prepartum (intention-to-treat population), and vaccine efficacy in infants born to women immunised at least 14 days prepartum (per-protocol population). The primary outcome was the occurrence of a first case of laboratory-confirmed influenza by age 6 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01430689.

findingsWe did this trial from Sept 12, 2011, to Jan 28, 2014. Between Sept 12, 2011, and April 18, 2013, we randomly assigned 4193 women to receive trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (n=2108) or quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine (n=2085). There were 4105 livebirths; 1797 (87%) of 2064 infants in the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine group and 1793 (88%) of 2041 infants in the quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine group were followed up until age 6 months. We recorded 5279 influenza-like illness episodes in 2789 (68%) infants, of which 131 (2%) episodes were laboratory-confirmed influenza. 129 (98%) cases of laboratory-confirmed influenza were first episodes (n=77 in the quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine group vs n=52 in the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine group). In the intention-to-treat population, overall infant vaccine efficacy was 33·1% (95% CI 3·7-53·9); in the per-protocol population, vaccine efficacy was 37·3% (7·6-57·8). Vaccine efficacy remained robust during the first 4 months of follow-up (67·9% [95% CI 35·1-85·3] by intention to treat and 70·2% [35·7-87·6] by per protocol), before diminishing during the fifth month (57·3% [30·6-74·4] and 60·7 [33·8-77·5], respectively). Adverse event rates in women and infants were similar among groups. Pain at the injection site was more common in women given quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine than in those given trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (n=253 vs n=132; p<0·0001), although 354 [92%] reactions were mild. Obstetrical and non-obstetrical serious adverse events were reported in 60 (3%) women in the quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine group and 61 (3%) women in the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine group. Presumed neonatal infection was more common in infants in the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine group than in those in the quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine group (n=60 vs n=37; p=0·02). No serious adverse events were related to vaccination.

interpretationVaccination of pregnant women with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in Mali-a poorly resourced country with high infant mortality-was technically and logistically feasible and protected infants from laboratory-confirmed influenza for 4 months. With adequate financing to procure the vaccine, implementation will parallel the access to antenatal care and immunisation coverage of pregnant women with tetanus toxoid.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdultFemaleHumansImmunizationImmunization ScheduleInfantInfant, NewbornInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaliMeningococcal VaccinesProspective StudiesVaccinationAdjuvants, ImmunologicInfluenza VaccinesMeningococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID27261067
PMCPMC4985566
OpenAlexW2414404462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.