Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27261005›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Mutations in Dnaaf1 and Lrrc48 Cause Hydrocephalus, Laterality Defects, and Sinusitis in Mice.

Seungshin Ha, Anna M Lindsay, Andrew E Timms, David R Beier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects ofHuman reproduction open · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PCD Genes-From Patients to Model Organisms and Back to Humans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Ependymal Cilia: Physiology and Role in Hydrocephalus.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Motile cilia genetics and cell biology: big results from little mice.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seungshin HaCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Washington 98101 Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-9498-4324
Anna M LindsayCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Washington 98101 Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, Washington.
Andrew E TimmsCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Washington 98101 Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, Washington.
David R BeierCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Washington 98101 Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, Washington david.beier@seattlechildrens.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0325-8520
Seattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

Mutagenesis and Murine Embyonic DevelopmentR01HD036404 · NICHD · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI BEIER, DAVID R. · 1998 to 2020
$8.1M
Analysis of neurodevelopment using mouse mutagenesisR01MH081187 · NIMH · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI BEIER, DAVID R. · 2008 to 2012
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD036404NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH081187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously described a forward genetic screen in mice for abnormalities of brain development. Characterization of two hydrocephalus mutants by whole-exome sequencing after whole-genome SNP mapping revealed novel recessive mutations in Dnaaf1 and Lrrc48 Mouse mutants of these two genes have not been previously reported. The Dnaaf1 mutant carries a mutation at the splice donor site of exon 4, which results in abnormal transcripts. The Lrrc48 mutation is a missense mutation at a highly conserved leucine residue, which is also associated with a decrease in Lrrc48 transcription. Both Dnaaf1 and Lrrc48 belong to a leucine-rich repeat-containing protein family and are components of the ciliary axoneme. Their Chlamydomonas orthologs are known to be required for normal ciliary beat frequency or flagellar waveform, respectively. Some Dnaaf1 or Lrrc48 homozygote mutants displayed laterality defects, suggesting a motile cilia defect in the embryonic node. Mucus accumulation and neutrophil infiltration in the maxillary sinuses suggested sinusitis. Dnaaf1 mutants showed postnatal lethality, and none survived to weaning age. Lrrc48 mutants survive to adulthood, but had male infertility. ARL13B immunostaining showed the presence of motile cilia in the mutants, and the distal distribution of DNAH9 in the axoneme of upper airway motile cilia appeared normal. The phenotypic abnormalities suggest that mutations in Dnaaf1 and Lrrc48 cause defects in motile cilia function.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCiliaFemaleFunctional LateralityHydrocephalusInfertility, MaleMaleMice, Mutant StrainsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsSinusitisDNAAF1 protein, mouseLRRC48 protein, mouseMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsDnaaf1/Lrrc50/Oda7ENU mutagenesisLrrc48/FAP134/Drc3motile ciliaprimary ciliary dyskinesia

Identifiers

PMID27261005
PMCPMC4978901
OpenAlexW2473351708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.