Observational studyBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016
Initiation of strong prescription opioids in Australia: cohort characteristics and factors associated with the type of opioid initiated.
Observational study in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding the first prescription: clinical and demographic drivers of strong opioid use in primary care.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Do CYP2D6 genotypes affect oxycodone dose, pharmacokinetics, pain, and adverse effects in cancer?Pharmacogenomics · 2024Article
- Five-Year Trajectories of Prescription Opioid Use.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Article
- ENhANCE trial protocol: A multi-centre, randomised, phase IV trial comparing the efficacy of oxycodone/naloxone prolonged release (OXN PR) versus oxycodone prolonged release (Oxy PR) tablets in patients with advanced cancer.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
- The Role of Pharmacogenomics in Opioid Prescribing.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022Review
- A 13-Year National Monitoring Study to Assess Narcotic Prescriptions and Indications (2007-2019).Drug safety · 2022Article
- Identifying incident cancer cases in dispensing claims: A validation study using Australia's Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data.International journal of population data science · 2019Article
- A population-based study of transdermal fentanyl initiation in Australian clinical practice.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Article
- General practitioners and management of chronic noncancer pain: a cross-sectional survey of influences on opioid deprescribing.Journal of pain research · 2019Article
- Prevalence and incidence of prescription opioid analgesic use in Australia.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Article
- Combating escalating harms associated with pharmaceutical opioid use in Australia: the POPPY II study protocol.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Initiation of strong prescription opioids in Australia: cohort characteristics and factors associated with the type of opioid initiated.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo describe the characteristics of Australians initiating strong opioids and examine the factors associated with the type of opioid initiated.
methodsPharmaceutical Benefits Scheme dispensing records were extracted for a 10% sample of people who initiated a strong opioid treatment episode (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone) between 29 September 2009 and 31 December 2013, as evidenced by the absence of a strong opioid dispensing for at least 90 days. The cohort was restricted to people with complete medicines ascertainment. Socio-demographic characteristics, previous dispensing histories and index opioid use were examined. Multinomial logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine the factors associated with the type of opioid medicine initiated, relative to oxycodone.
resultsThe cohort consisted of 125 335 people: 58.3% were female and 63.7% were aged ≥65 years. The most commonly initiated strong opioid was oxycodone (72.8%), usually 5 mg immediate-release tablets (76.1%). Compared to people aged 18-44 years, those ≥85 years were 14.18 times as likely (95% CI 12.67-15.87) to initiate morphine than oxycodone. Compared to people without a cancer treatment history, those with a cancer treatment history were 2.34 times as likely (95% CI 2.11-2.60) to initiate morphine than oxycodone.
conclusionsThe most commonly initiated strong opioid was oxycodone, usually at lower strengths. Those who initiated oxycodone were more likely to be younger with no previous cancer treatment history. As these are high-risk characteristics for potential harms, a judicious approach when initiating strong opioids for this group is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.