Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27260559›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2016

Noninvasive Failure Load Prediction of Vertebrae with Simulated Lytic Defects and Biomaterial Augmentation.

Hugo Giambini, Zhong Fang, Heng Zeng, Jon J Camp, Michael J Yaszemski, Lichun Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanical testing setups affect spine segment fracture outcomes.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hugo Giambini1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Zhong Fang1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Heng Zeng1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Jon J Camp3 Biomedical Imaging Resource, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Michael J Yaszemski1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Lichun Lu1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · USTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

Musculoskeletal Research Training ProgramT32AR056950 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Jennifer J Westendorf · 2009 to 2026
$7.0M
Metastatic Spine Tumors: Minimally Invasive Fracture Risk Analysis and Treatment - MasterR01AR056212 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Benjamin D Elder, Lichun Lu · 2008 to 2026
$6.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056212NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR056950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spine is the most common site for secondary bone metastases, and clinical management for fractures is based on size and geometry of the defect. About 75% of the bone needs to be damaged before lesions are detectable, so clinical tools should measure changes in both geometry and material properties. We have developed an automated, user-friendly, Spine Cancer Assessment (SCA) image-based analysis method that builds on a platform designed for clinical practice providing failure characteristics of vertebrae. The objectives of this study were to (1) validate SCA predictions with experimental failure load outcomes; (2) evaluate the planning capabilities for prophylactic vertebroplasty procedures; and (3) investigate the effect of computed tomography (CT) protocols on predicted failure loads. Twenty-one vertebrae were randomly divided into two groups: (1) simulated defect without treatment (negative control) [n = 9] and (2) with treatment [n = 12]. Defects were created and a polymeric biomaterial was injected into the vertebrae in the treated-defect group. Spines were scanned, reconstructed with two algorithms, and analyzed for fracture loads. To virtually plan for prophylactic intervention, vertebrae with empty lesions were simulated to be augmented with either poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) or a novel bone replacement copolymer, poly(propylene fumarate-co-caprolactone) [P(PF-co-CL)]. Axial rigidities were calculated from the CT images. Failure loads, determined from the cross section with the lowest axial rigidity, were compared with experimental values. Predicted loads correlated well with experimental outcomes (R(2) = 0.73, p < 0.0001). Predictions from negative control specimens highly correlated with measured values (R(2) = 0.90, p < 0.0001). Although a similar correlation was obtained using both algorithms, the smooth reconstruction (B30) tended to underestimate predicted failure loads by ∼50% compared with the ∼10% underestimate of the sharp reconstruction (B70). Percent increase in failure loads after virtual vertebroplasty showed a higher increase in samples with PMMA compared with those with copolymer. The SCA method developed in this study calculated failure loads from quantitative computed tomography scans in vertebrae with simulated metastatic lytic defects, with or without treatment, facilitating clinical applicability and providing more reliable guidelines for physicians to select appropriate treatment options. Furthermore, the analysis could accommodate augmentation planning procedures that aimed to determine the optimum material that would increase vertebral body failure load.

Indexed as

Bone DensityComputer SimulationCadaverHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOsteolysisSpinal NeoplasmsSpineTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID27260559
PMCPMC4991609
OpenAlexW2413501483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.