Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27260412›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2016

Alkaline hydrolysis to remove potentially infectious viral RNA contaminants from DNA.

Karissa A Lemire, Yelitza Y Rodriguez, Michael T McIntosh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karissa A LemireForeign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, NVSL, STAS, VS, APHIS, USDA, Plum Island Animal Disease Center, PO Box 848, Greenport, NY, 11944-0848, USA.
Yelitza Y RodriguezForeign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, NVSL, STAS, VS, APHIS, USDA, Plum Island Animal Disease Center, PO Box 848, Greenport, NY, 11944-0848, USA.
Michael T McIntoshForeign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, NVSL, STAS, VS, APHIS, USDA, Plum Island Animal Disease Center, PO Box 848, Greenport, NY, 11944-0848, USA. michael.t.mcintosh@aphis.usda.gov.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnostics and research of high-consequence animal disease agents is often limited to laboratories with a high level of biosecurity that restrict the transport of biological material. Often, sharing of DNA with external partners is needed to support diagnostics, forensics, or research. Even in the absence of virus, RNA from positive-sense single stranded RNA (+ssRNA) viruses that may contaminate otherwise purified DNA preparations continues to pose a threat due to its potential to be infectious via direct translation to yield viral proteins. While the risk of animal infection or accidental reconstitution and release of a virus from RNA is very low, the high impact of an animal disease event associated with the accidental release of some + ssRNA viruses, such as classical swine fever or foot-and-mouth disease viruses, necessitates the precaution of having procedures to ensure the complete inactivation of viruses and + ssRNA viral genomes. RNA and DNA are differentially susceptible to enzymatic degradations; however, such procedures are susceptible to unintended DNA damage and/or failure due to enzyme or cofactor instabilities. Therefore, we describe the development and verification of a robust and simple chemical and physical method to selectively degrade RNA from purified DNA preparations. The procedure employs incubation of DNA in 0.25 N sodium hydroxide at 65 °C for 1 h followed by neutralization and boiling for 10 min to hydrolyze contaminating RNA and inactivate animal disease viruses from DNA preparations. Additional critical quality control elements include use of a synthetic control RNA (SCR) and an SCR-specific real-time RT-PCR to track effectiveness of the procedure in a parallel treated control sample, and a pH check of reagents to ensure proper neutralization of alkaline conditions.

resultsThe new procedure reduced intact RNA beyond the limit of detection by realtime RT-PCR and inactivated viruses by in vitro culture infectivity assays.

conclusionsTreated DNA, while denatured, remains suitable for most common molecular biology procedures including PCR, transformation of E. coli, and molecular sequencing. The procedure ensures not only the inactivation of a variety of viruses but also the degradation through hydrolysis of potentially contaminating infectious + ssRNA viral genomes.

Indexed as

HydrolysisVirus InactivationAnimalsDisinfectantsDNAHot TemperatureHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationRNA, ViralSodium HydroxideTime FactorsDisinfectantsDNARNA, ViralSodium Hydroxide

Identifiers

PMID27260412
PMCPMC4893296
OpenAlexW2417260327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.