Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27260357›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2016

Phylogenetically Structured Differences in rRNA Gene Sequence Variation among Species of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Their Implications for Sequence Clustering.

Geoffrey L House, Saliya Ekanayake, Yang Ruan, Ursel M E Schütte, Wittaya Kaonongbua, Geoffrey Fox, Yuzhen Ye, James D Bever

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Enriched COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Geoffrey L HouseDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA glhouse@indiana.edu.
Saliya EkanayakeSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Yang RuanSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Ursel M E SchütteDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA Integrated Program in the Environment, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Wittaya KaonongbuaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand.
Geoffrey FoxSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Yuzhen YeSchool of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
James D BeverDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · USKing Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledArbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi form mutualisms with plant roots that increase plant growth and shape plant communities. Each AM fungal cell contains a large amount of genetic diversity, but it is unclear if this diversity varies across evolutionary lineages. We found that sequence variation in the nuclear large-subunit (LSU) rRNA gene from 29 isolates representing 21 AM fungal species generally assorted into genus- and species-level clades, with the exception of species of the genera Claroideoglomus and Entrophospora However, there were significant differences in the levels of sequence variation across the phylogeny and between genera, indicating that it is an evolutionarily constrained trait in AM fungi. These consistent patterns of sequence variation across both phylogenetic and taxonomic groups pose challenges to interpreting operational taxonomic units (OTUs) as approximations of species-level groups of AM fungi. We demonstrate that the OTUs produced by five sequence clustering methods using 97% or equivalent sequence similarity thresholds failed to match the expected species of AM fungi, although OTUs from AbundantOTU, CD-HIT-OTU, and CROP corresponded better to species than did OTUs from mothur or UPARSE. This lack of OTU-to-species correspondence resulted both from sequences of one species being split into multiple OTUs and from sequences of multiple species being lumped into the same OTU. The OTU richness therefore will not reliably correspond to the AM fungal species richness in environmental samples. Conservatively, this error can overestimate species richness by 4-fold or underestimate richness by one-half, and the direction of this error will depend on the genera represented in the sample. IMPORTANCE: Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi form important mutualisms with the roots of most plant species. Individual AM fungi are genetically diverse, but it is unclear whether the level of this diversity differs among evolutionary lineages. We found that the amount of sequence variation in an rRNA gene that is commonly used to identify AM fungal species varied significantly between evolutionary groups that correspond to different genera, with the exception of two genera that are genetically indistinguishable from each other. When we clustered groups of similar sequences into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using five different clustering methods, these patterns of sequence variation caused the number of OTUs to either over- or underestimate the actual number of AM fungal species, depending on the genus. Our results indicate that OTU-based inferences about AM fungal species composition from environmental sequences can be improved if they take these taxonomically structured patterns of sequence variation into account.

Indexed as

Genes, FungalGenes, rRNAPhylogenyCluster AnalysisGenetic VariationMycorrhizaeSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID27260357
PMCPMC4968537
OpenAlexW2413180880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.