Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27260187›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2016

Nutrient limitation drives response of Calamagrostis epigejos to arbuscular mycorrhiza in primary succession.

Jana Rydlová, David Püschel, Magdalena Dostálová, Martina Janoušková, Jan Frouz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jana RydlováInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. jana.rydlova@ibot.cas.cz.
David PüschelInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Magdalena DostálováDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Viničná 5, 128 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
Martina JanouškováInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Jan FrouzInstitute for Environmental Studies, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany · CZCharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the functioning of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis over the course of primary succession, where soil, host plants, and AM fungal communities all undergo significant changes. Over the course of succession at the studied post-mining site, plant cover changes from an herbaceous community to the closed canopy of a deciduous forest. Calamagrostis epigejos (Poaceae) is a common denominator at all stages, and it dominates among AM host species. Its growth response to AM fungi was studied at four distinctive stages of natural succession: 12, 20, 30, and 50 years of age, each represented by three spatially separated sites. Soils obtained from all 12 studied sites were γ-sterilized and used in a greenhouse experiment in which C. epigejos plants were (1) inoculated with a respective community of native AM fungi, (2) inoculated with reference AM fungal isolates from laboratory collection, or (3) cultivated without AM fungi. AM fungi strongly boosted plant growth during the first two stages but not during the latter two, where the effect was neutral or even negative. While plant phosphorus (P) uptake was generally increased by AM fungi, no contribution of mycorrhizae to nitrogen (N) uptake was recorded. Based on N:P in plant biomass, we related the turn from a positive to a neutral/negative effect of AM fungi on plant growth, observed along the chronosequence, to a shift in relative P and N availability. No functional differences were found between native and reference inocula, yet root colonization by the native AM fungi decreased relative to the reference inoculum in the later succession stages, thereby indicating shifts in the composition of AM fungal communities reflected in different functional characteristics of their members.

Indexed as

MycorrhizaePlant DevelopmentPoaceaeSoilSoil MicrobiologyTime FactorsSoilChronosequenceMycorrhizal growth responsePrimary succession of plantsSpoil banks

Identifiers

PMID27260187
OpenAlexW2464479705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.