Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27259655›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of urology2016

Biomarkers for Wilms Tumor: A Systematic Review.

Eugene B Cone, Stewart S Dalton, Megan Van Noord, Elizabeth T Tracy, Henry E Rice, Jonathan C Routh

Open access · greenAbstract readEditorialSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. miR-138-5p inhibits WiT-49 cell growth in vitro by downregulating TCF3 expression, and suppresses tumorigenesis in vivo.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eugene B ConeDivision of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Stewart S DaltonUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Megan Van NoordDuke University Medical Library, Durham, North Carolina.
Elizabeth T TracyDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Henry E RiceDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jonathan C RouthDivision of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: Jonathan.Routh@duke.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USFlorida College · US

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness of Vesicoureteral Reflux Treatments in ChildrenK08DK100534 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ROUTH, JONATHAN C · 2014 to 2018
$671k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK100534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWilms tumor is the most common childhood renal malignancy and the fourth most common childhood cancer. Many biomarkers have been studied but there has been no comprehensive summary. We systematically reviewed the literature on biomarkers in Wilms tumor to quantify the prognostic implications of the presence of individual tumor markers. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched for English language studies from 1980 to 2015 performed in patients younger than 18 years with Wilms tumor and prognostic data. The protocol was conducted per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Two reviewers abstracted data in duplicate using a standard evaluation form. We performed descriptive statistics, then calculated relative risks and 95% confidence intervals for markers appearing in multiple level II or III studies.

resultsA total of 40 studies were included examining 32 biomarkers in 7,381 patients with Wilms tumor. Studies had a median of 61 patients, 24 biomarker positive patients per series and a median followup of 68.4 months. Median percentages of patients with stages 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 tumors were 28.5%, 26.4%, 24.5%, 14.1% and 1.7%, respectively, and 10.2% had anaplasia. The strongest negative prognostic association was loss of heterozygosity at 11p15, with a risk of recurrence of 5.00, although loss of heterozygosity at 1p and gain of function at 1q were also strongly linked to increased recurrence (2.93 and 2.86, respectively).

conclusionsSeveral tumor markers are associated with an increased risk of recurrence or a decreased risk of overall survival in patients with Wilms tumor. These data suggest targets for development of diagnostic tests and potential therapies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorChildHumansKidney NeoplasmsPrognosisWilms TumorBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarkerskidney neoplasmspediatricsprognosisWilms tumor

Identifiers

PMID27259655
PMCPMC5069120
OpenAlexW2415050089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.