Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27259561›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2016

Ex Vivo Testing of Patient-Derived Xenografts Mirrors the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

David Roife, Bingbing Dai, Ya'an Kang, Mayrim V Rios Perez, Michael Pratt, Xinqun Li, Jason B Fleming

Expression of concernOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Translational 3DFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Real timeOncotarget · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David Roife *Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Bingbing Dai *Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Ya'an KangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Mayrim V Rios PerezDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Michael PrattDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Xinqun LiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Jason B FlemingDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
TRAINING OF ACADEMIC SURGICAL ONCOLOGISTST32CA009599 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Ashley M Holder, Jennifer A. Wargo · 1988 to 2026
$13.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTranslation of the patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model into a method for practical personalized cancer treatment is prevented by the intense resources and time necessary to generate and test each tumorgraft. We aimed to develop a high-throughput ex vivo drug testing approach that can be used for personalized cancer treatment design. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe developed a unique ex vivo live tissue sensitivity assay (LTSA), in which precision-cut and uniform small tissue slices derived from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma PDX tumors were arrayed in a 96-well plate and screened against clinically relevant regimens within 3 to 5 days. The correlation between the sensitivities of tissue slices to the regimens and patients' clinical responses and outcome were statistically analyzed. The results of LTSA assay were further confirmed with biochemical methods in vitro and animal PDX model in vivo

resultsThe ex vivo tissue slices remain viable for at least 5 days, and the tumor parenchyma, including stroma, vascular structures, and signaling pathways, are all retained. The sensitivities of the ex vivo tissue slices to gemcitabine and irinotecan was consistent with the clinical responses and outcomes of the patients from whom the tumorgrafts were derived (r = 0.77; P = 0.0002). Retrospective analysis showed that the patients who received LTSA-sensitive regimens had remarkably longer progression-free survival than patients who received LTSA-resistant regimens (16.33 vs. 3.8 months; n = 18, P = 0.011).

conclusionsThe results from these PDX and LTSA methods reflect clinical patients' responses and could be used as a personalized strategy for improving systemic therapy effectiveness in patients with pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 22(24); 6021-30. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCamptothecinCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGemcitabineHeterograftsHumansIrinotecanMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, NudeAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCamptothecinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineIrinotecan

Identifiers

PMID27259561
PMCPMC5136340
OpenAlexW2413264200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.