Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27259392›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of arthroplasty2016

Preoperative Pain and Function: Profiles of Patients Selected for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Uyen-Sa D T Nguyen, David C Ayers, Wenjun Li, Leslie R Harrold, Patricia D Franklin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of arthroplasty, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Translating clinical and patient-reported data to tailored shared decision reports with predictive analytics for knee and hip arthritis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Changes of Somatosensory Phenotype in the Course of Disease in Osteoarthritis Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Uyen-Sa D T NguyenDepartment of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
David C AyersDepartment of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Wenjun LiDepartment of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Leslie R HarroldDepartment of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Patricia D FranklinDepartment of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.

Funding

Improving Orthopedic Outcomes Through a National TJR RegistryP50HS018910 · AHRQ · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FRANKLIN, PATRICIA D · 2010 to 2013
$11.9M
Collider Bias and the Risk Factor Paradoxes in Rheumatic Disease ResearchK01AR064351 · NIAMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI NGUYEN, UYEN-SA DUC TRAN · 2013 to 2017
$617k
AHRQ HHS P50 HS018910NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR064351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment to relieve pain and restore function in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. TKA utilization is growing rapidly, and the appropriateness of current TKA use is of great interest. We examined patient-reported preoperative pain and function profiles to understand symptom severity at the time of TKA decision.

methodsData were from the Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement. We included patients undergoing primary, unilateral TKAs between 2011 and 2014 for osteoarthritis and had data on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain and Short-Form 36-item Physical Component Summary (PCS) score. We compared patient profiles across groupings by symptoms: (1) little pain and high function (KOOS ≥70, PCS ≥40); (2) little pain but poor function (KOOS ≥70, PCS <40); (3) high pain but high function (KOOS <70, PCS ≥40); and (4) high pain and poor function (KOOS <70, PCS <40).

resultsOf 6936 patients, 77% had high pain and poor function (group 4), 19% had high pain "or" poor function (groups 2-3), and 5% had little pain and high function before TKA (group 1). In group 1, 86% were constantly aware of their knee problem, 48% reported pain daily yet 5% experienced severe or extreme pain on stairs, and 1% pain in bed. Over half had a lot of limitations in vigorous activities. Compared with group 4, group 1 were older, less obese, more educated, and included more men and people reporting being healthy, less disabled, and happy (P < .05 for all).

conclusionMost patients undergoing TKAs had significant pain and/or poor function. Our results provide critical information given the current debate of potentially inappropriate TKA utilization in the United States.

Indexed as

Preoperative PeriodAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKnee InjuriesKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePainPain MeasurementPhysical ExaminationTreatment Outcomecutoff pointfunctionpaintotal joint arthroplastytotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID27259392
PMCPMC5069189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.