Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27259241›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Comparative evaluation of three proliferation markers, Ki-67, TOP2A, and RacGAP1, in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms: Issues and prospects.

Elisa Neubauer, Ralph M Wirtz, Daniel Kaemmerer, Maria Athelogou, Lydia Schmidt, Jörg Sänger, Amelie Lupp

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The PPARβ/Delta-Induced Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Secretome Has Cytoprotective Effects via ANGPTL4 in a Pre-Clinical Model of Acute Lung Inflammation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Revealing the role of SPP1Cell & bioscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fixing the GAP: The role of RhoGAPs in cancer.European journal of cell biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa NeubauerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Ralph M WirtzSTRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH Köln, Köln, Germany.
Daniel KaemmererDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
Maria AthelogouDEFINIENS AG, München, Germany.
Lydia SchmidtInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Jörg SängerLaboratory of Cytology and Pathology, Bad Berka, Germany.
Amelie LuppInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DEZentralklinik Bad Berka · DEJena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (BP-NEN) into four tumor entities (typical carcinoids (TC), atypical carcinoids (AC), small cell lung cancers (SCLC), large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinomas (LCNEC)) is difficult to perform accurately, but important for prognostic statements and therapeutic management decisions. In this regard, we compared the expression of three proliferation markers, Ki-67, Topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A), and RacGAP1, in a series of tumor samples from 104 BP-NEN patients (24 TC, 21 AC, 52 SCLC, 7 LCNEC) using different evaluation methods (immunohistochemistry (IHC): Average evaluation, Hotspot evaluation, digital image analysis; RT-qPCR).The results indicated that all three markers had increased protein and mRNA expression with poorer differentiation and correlated well with each other, as well as with grading, staging, and poor survival. Compared with Ki-67 and TOP2A, RacGAP1 allowed for a clearer prognostic statement. The cut-off limits obtained for Ki-67-Average (IHC) were TC-AC 1.5, AC-SCLC 19, and AC-LCNEC 23.5. The Hotspot evaluation generated equal to higher, the digital image analysis generally lower between-entity cut-off limits.All three markers enabled a clear-cut differentiation between the BP-NEN entities, and all methods evaluated were suitable for marker assessment. However, to define optimal cut-off limits, the Ki-67 evaluation methods should be standardized. RacGAP1 appeared to be a new marker with great potential.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoid TumorCarcinoma, Large CellDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGTPase-Activating ProteinsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKi-67 AntigenLungLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingNeuroendocrine TumorsPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIGTPase-Activating ProteinsKi-67 AntigenmgcRacGAPPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsTOP2A protein, humanIHC/RT-qPCRKi-67lung neuroendocrine neoplasmsRacGAP1topoisomerase 2 alpha

Identifiers

PMID27259241
PMCPMC5173108
OpenAlexW2410799646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.