Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27259206›Full record

ReviewMolecular cell2016

Replicating Large Genomes: Divide and Conquer.

Juan Carlos Rivera-Mulia, David M Gilbert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PARTAGE: Parallel analysis of replication timing and gene expression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Cellular Responses to Widespread DNA Replication Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Optimized Repli-seq: improved DNA replication timing analysis by next-generation sequencing.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Juan Carlos Rivera-MuliaDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4295, USA.
David M GilbertDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4295, USA; Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4295, USA. Electronic address: gilbert@bio.fsu.edu.

Funding

UNDERSTANDING MECHANISMS OF hESC SELF-RENEWAL AND CELL FATE COMMITMENTP01GM085354 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI DALTON, STEPHEN · 2008 to 2018
$18.3M
Genome Plasticity during ES Cell Differentiation to Neural LineagesR01GM083337 · NIGMS · SAN DIEGO BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI David M Gilbert · 2007 to 2026
$6.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM085354NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete duplication of large metazoan chromosomes requires thousands of potential initiation sites, only a small fraction of which are selected in each cell cycle. Assembly of the replication machinery is highly conserved and tightly regulated during the cell cycle, but the sites of initiation are highly flexible, and their temporal order of firing is regulated at the level of large-scale multi-replicon domains. Importantly, the number of replication forks must be quickly adjusted in response to replication stress to prevent genome instability. Here we argue that large genomes are divided into domains for exactly this reason. Once established, domain structure abrogates the need for precise initiation sites and creates a scaffold for the evolution of other chromosome functions.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationGenomeS PhaseAnimalsBase SequenceCell LineageChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNADNA DamageGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomic InstabilityGenotypeHumansModels, GeneticNucleic Acid ConformationPhenotypeDNATranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID27259206
PMCPMC4893193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.