Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27259032›Full record

ArticleNanotoxicology2016

Multilaboratory evaluation of 15 bioassays for (eco)toxicity screening and hazard ranking of engineered nanomaterials: FP7 project NANOVALID.

Olesja M Bondarenko, Margit Heinlaan, Mariliis Sihtmäe, Angela Ivask, Imbi Kurvet, Elise Joonas, Anita Jemec, Marika Mannerström, Tuula Heinonen, Rohit Rekulapelly and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanotoxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nanomaterials, a New Challenge in the Workplace.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bioconcentration of Organotin Cations during Molting InhibitsEnvironmental science & technology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Olesja M Bondarenkoa Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology , National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics , Tallinn , Estonia .
Margit Heinlaana Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology , National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics , Tallinn , Estonia .
Mariliis Sihtmäea Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology , National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics , Tallinn , Estonia .
Angela Ivaska Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology , National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics , Tallinn , Estonia .
Imbi Kurveta Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology , National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics , Tallinn , Estonia .
Elise Joonasa Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology , National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics , Tallinn , Estonia .
Anita Jemecc Biotechnical Faculty , University of Ljubljana , Ljubljana , Slovenia .
Marika Mannerströmd The Finnish Centre for Alternative Methods (FICAM) , School of Medicine, University of Tampere , Tampere , Finland .
Tuula Heinonend The Finnish Centre for Alternative Methods (FICAM) , School of Medicine, University of Tampere , Tampere , Finland .
Rohit Rekulapellye The Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology, Habsiguda , Hyderabad, Telangana , India , and.
Shashi Singhe The Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology, Habsiguda , Hyderabad, Telangana , India , and.
Jing Zouf Hearing and Balance Research Unit , Field of Oto-Laryngology, School of Medicine, University of Tampere , Tampere , Finland.
Ilmari Pyykköf Hearing and Balance Research Unit , Field of Oto-Laryngology, School of Medicine, University of Tampere , Tampere , Finland.
Damjana Drobnec Biotechnical Faculty , University of Ljubljana , Ljubljana , Slovenia .
Anne Kahrua Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology , National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics , Tallinn , Estonia .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within EU FP7 project NANOVALID, the (eco)toxicity of 7 well-characterized engineered nanomaterials (NMs) was evaluated by 15 bioassays in 4 laboratories. The highest tested nominal concentration of NMs was 100 mg/l. The panel of the bioassays yielded the following toxicity order: Ag > ZnO > CuO > TiO2 > MWCNTs > SiO2 > Au. Ag, ZnO and CuO proved very toxic in the majority of assays, assumingly due to dissolution. The latter was supported by the parallel analysis of the toxicity of respective soluble metal salts. The most sensitive tests/species were Daphnia magna (towards Ag NMs, 24-h EC50 = 0.003 mg Ag/l), algae Raphidocelis subcapitata (ZnO and CuO, 72-h EC50 = 0.14 mg Zn/l and 0.7 mg Cu/l, respectively) and murine fibroblasts BALB/3T3 (CuO, 48-h EC50 = 0.7 mg Cu/l). MWCNTs showed toxicity only towards rat alveolar macrophages (EC50 = 15.3 mg/l) assumingly due to high aspect ratio and TiO2 towards R. subcapitata (EC50 = 6.8 mg Ti/l) due to agglomeration of TiO2 and entrapment of algal cells. Finally, we constructed a decision tree to select the bioassays for hazard ranking of NMs. For NM testing, we recommend a multitrophic suite of 4 in vitro (eco)toxicity assays: 48-h D. magna immobilization (OECD202), 72-h R. subcapitata growth inhibition (OECD201), 30-min Vibrio fischeri bioluminescence inhibition (ISO2010) and 48-h murine fibroblast BALB/3T3 neutral red uptake in vitro (OECD129) representing crustaceans, algae, bacteria and mammalian cells, respectively. Notably, our results showed that these assays, standardized for toxicity evaluation of "regular" chemicals, proved efficient also for shortlisting of hazardous NMs. Additional assays are recommended for immunotoxicity evaluation of high aspect ratio NMs (such as MWCNTs).

Indexed as

Aliivibrio fischeriAnimalsBiological AssayCells, CulturedChlorophytaDaphniaEcotoxicologyFibroblastsHazardous SubstancesLaboratoriesNanostructuresRatsRisk AssessmentSolubilitySurface PropertiesToxicity TestsHazardous SubstancesMetalsmultitrophic test batteryphysico-chemical characterizationrisk assessmentsolubilization

Identifiers

PMID27259032
PMCPMC5030619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.