ArticlePloS one2016
Impact of the Type of First Medical Contact within a Guideline-Conform ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Network: A Prospective Observational Registry Study.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- First medical contact-to-balloon time and in-hospital outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Jenin, Palestine: a retrospective cohort study (2023-2024).BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Triage of Stable Patients With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction and Left Bundle Branch Block: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Observational
- Pretreatment With Unfractionated Heparin in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction—A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024Observational
- Impact of respiratory infectious epidemics on STEMI incidence and care.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- How long is long enough? Good neurologic outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors despite prolonged resuscitation: a retrospective cohort study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020Article
- The effects of prehospital system delays on the treatment efficacy of STEMI patients.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2019Article
- Observational
- Gender differences in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) time delays: experience of a public health service in Salvador-Brazil.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe impact of type of first medical contact (FMC) in the setting of a guideline conform metropolitan ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) network providing obligatory primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear. METHODS AND
results3,312 patients were prospectively included between 2006 and 2012 into a registry accompanying the "Cologne Infarction Model" STEMI network, with 68.4% primarily presenting to emergency medical service (EMS), 17.6% to non-PCI-capable hospitals, and 14.0% to PCI-capable hospitals. Median contact-to-balloon time differed significantly by FMC with 89 minutes (IQR 72-115) for EMS, 107 minutes (IQR 85-148) for non-PCI- and 65 minutes (IQR 48-91) for PCI-capable hospitals (p < 0.001). TIMI-flow grade III and in-hospital mortality were 75.7% and 10.4% in EMS, 70.3% and 8.6% in non-PCI capable hospital and 84.4% and 5.6% in PCI-capable hospital presenters, respectively (p both < 0.01). The association of FMC with in-hospital mortality was not significant after adjustment for baseline characteristics, but risk of TIMI-flow grade < III remained significantly increased in patients presenting to non-PCI capable hospitals.
conclusionDespite differences in treatment delay by type of FMC in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly. The increased risk of TIMI-flow grade < III in patients presenting to non PCI-capable hospitals needs further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.