ArticleMedicine2016
Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Europe: Implementation and Outcomes.
Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimally invasive versus open surgery among colorectal cancer patients.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Open Versus Laparoscopic Oncological Resections for Colon Cancer: An Experience at an Average-Volume Center.Cureus · 2024Article
- Lateral lymph node dissection can increase overall survival and 5‑year survival rate of rectal cancer patients: A meta‑analysis.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Resection margins, lymph node harvest and 3 year survival in open and laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery; a prospective cohort study.Discover oncology · 2023Article
- Time trends in the incidence rates of venous thromboembolism following colorectal resection by indication and operative technique.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022Article
- Open surgery in the era of minimally invasive surgery.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2022Article
- Predictors of 30-Day Mortality Among Dutch Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery, 2011-2016.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Association of laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy on the long-term health-related quality of life of colon cancer survivors.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Short-term outcomes after elective colon cancer surgery: an observational study from the Norwegian registry for gastrointestinal and HPB surgery, NoRGast.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Observational
- Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Observational
- Long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic vs. open colon cancer resection: a high-quality population-based analysis in a Southern German district.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Observational
- The colorectal cancer epidemic: challenges and opportunities for primary, secondary and tertiary prevention.British journal of cancer · 2018Review
- Administration of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II-III colon cancer patients: An European population-based study.International journal of cancer · 2018Article
- Laparoscopy may decrease morbidity and length of stay after elective colon cancer resection, especially in frail patients: results from an observational real-life study.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Observational
- Erratum: Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Europe: Implementation and Outcomes: Erratum.Medicine · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of colorectal cancer (CRC) was first introduced over 20 years ago and recently has gained increasing acceptance and usage beyond clinical trials. However, data on dissemination of the method across countries and on long-term outcomes are still sparse.In the context of a European collaborative study, a total of 112,023 CRC cases from 3 population-based (N = 109,695) and 4 institute-based clinical cancer registries (N = 2328) were studied and compared on the utilization of MIS versus open surgery. Cox regression models were applied to study associations between surgery type and survival of patients from the population-based registries. The study considered adjustment for potential confounders.The percentage of CRC patients undergoing MIS differed substantially between centers and generally increased over time. MIS was significantly less often used in stage II to IV colon cancer compared with stage I in most centers. MIS tended to be less often used in older (70+) than in younger colon cancer patients. MIS tended to be more often used in women than in men with rectal cancer. MIS was associated with significantly reduced mortality among colon cancer patients in the Netherlands (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.63-0.69), Sweden (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.60-0.76), and Norway (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.67-0.79). Likewise, MIS was associated with reduced mortality of rectal cancer patients in the Netherlands (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.68-0.80) and Sweden (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90).Utilization of MIS in CRC resection is increasing, but large variation between European countries and clinical centers prevails. Our results support association of MIS with substantially enhanced survival among colon cancer patients. Further studies controlling for selection bias and residual confounding are needed to establish role of MIS in survival of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.