Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27258507›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2016

Clinic and Home Blood Pressure Lowering Effect of an Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, Fimasartan, in Postmenopausal Women with Hypertension.

Song-Yi Kim, Seung-Jae Joo, Mi-Seung Shin, Changsoo Kim, Eun Joo Cho, Ki-Chul Sung, Seok-Min Kang, Dong-Soo Kim, Seung Hwan Lee, Kyung-Kuk Hwang and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Song-Yi KimFrom the Department of Internal Medicine (S-YK, S-JJ), Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju; Division of Cardiology (M-SS), Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon; Department of Preventive Medicine (CK), Yonsei University College of Medicine; Division of Cardiology (EJC), Department of Internal Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea; Division of Cardiology (K-CS), Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine; Cardiology Division (S-MK), Severance Cardiovascular Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul; Division of Cardiology (D-SK), Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan; Division of Cardiology (SHL), Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju Medical College, Yonsei University, Wonju; Department of Internal Medicine (K-KH), Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju; and Division of Cardiology (JBP), Department of Internal Medicine, Cheil General Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung-Jae Joo
Mi-Seung Shin
Changsoo Kim
Eun Joo Cho
Ki-Chul Sung
Seok-Min Kang
Dong-Soo Kim
Seung Hwan Lee
Kyung-Kuk Hwang
Jeong Bae Park

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiotensin receptor blockers may be an appropriate first-line agent for postmenopausal women with hypertension because the activation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is suggested as one possible mechanism of postmenopausal hypertension. However, there are few studies substantiating this effect. This study aimed to investigate clinic and home blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of fimasartan, a new angiotensin receptor blocker, in postmenopausal women with hypertension.Among patients with hypertension enrolled in K-Mets Study, 1373 women with fimasartan as a first antihypertensive drug and 3-months follow-up data were selected. They were divided into 2 groups; premenopausal women (pre-MPW; n = 382, 45.3 ± 4.6 years) and postmenopausal women (post-MPW; n = 991, 60.9 ± 8.2 years).Baseline clinic systolic BP was not different (pre-MPW; 152.9 ± 15.2 vs. post-MPW; 152.8 ± 13.5 mm Hg), but diastolic BP was lower in post-MPW (pre-MPW; 95.7 ± 9.4 vs. post-MPW; 91.9 ± 9.4 mm Hg, P <0.001). After 3-month treatment, clinic BP declined effectively without significant differences between 2 groups (Δsystolic/diastolic BP: pre-MPW; -25.7 ± 17.7/-14.2 ± 11.3 vs. post-MPW; -25.7 ± 16.3/-13.1 ± 10.9 mm Hg). Home morning and evening systolic BP decreased similarly in both groups (Δmorning/evening systolic BP: pre-MPW; -21.3 ± 17.9/-23.1 ± 15.8 vs. post-MPW; -20.4 ± 17.3/-20.2 ± 19.2 mm Hg). Fimasartan also significantly decreased the standard deviations of home morning and evening systolic BP of pre-MPW and post-MPW.Fimasartan was a similarly effective BP lowering agent in both post-MPW and pre-MPW with hypertension, and it also decreased day-to-day BP variability.

Indexed as

PostmenopauseAdultAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansHypertensionMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPulseAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsfimasartanPyrimidinesTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID27258507
PMCPMC4900715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.