Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27258491›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2016

Refined Phenotyping of Modic Changes: Imaging Biomarkers of Prolonged Severe Low Back Pain and Disability.

Juhani H Määttä, Jaro Karppinen, Markus Paananen, Cora Bow, Keith D K Luk, Kenneth M C Cheung, Dino Samartzis

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. IntradiscalJOR spine · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Characterization of bone & cartilage endplate junction in the human lumbar spine: novel ultrastructural insights & association with elemental composition, vascularity and degeneration.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juhani H MäättäFrom the Medical Research Center Oulu (JHM, JK, MP), Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu; Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (JK); Center for Life Course Health Research (JK), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; and the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (CB, KDKL, KMCC, DS), The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Jaro Karppinen
Markus Paananen
Cora Bow
Keith D K Luk
Kenneth M C Cheung
Dino Samartzis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is the world's most disabling condition. Modic changes (MC) are vertebral bone marrow changes adjacent to the endplates as noted on magnetic resonance imaging. The associations of specific MC types and patterns with prolonged, severe LBP and disability remain speculative. This study assessed the relationship of prolonged, severe LBP and back-related disability, with the presence and morphology of lumbar MC in a large cross-sectional population-based study of Southern Chinese.We addressed the topographical and morphological dimensions of MC along with other magnetic resonance imaging phenotypes (eg, disc degeneration and displacement) on the basis of axial T1 and sagittal T2-weighted imaging of L1-S1. Prolonged severe LBP was defined as LBP lasting ≥30 days during the past year, and a visual analog scale severest pain intensity of at least 6/10. An Oswestry Disability Index score of 15% was regarded as significant disability. We also assessed subject demographics, occupation, and lifestyle factors.In total, 1142 subjects (63% females, mean age 53 years) were assessed. Of these, 282 (24.7%) had MC (7.1% type I, 17.6% type II). MC subjects were older (P = 0.003), had more frequent disc displacements (P < 0.001) and greater degree of disc degeneration (P < 0.001) than non-MC subjects. In adjusted models, any MC (odds ratio [OR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.18), MC affecting whole anterior-posterior length (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04-2.51), and MC affecting 2/3 posterior length (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.17-6.65) were associated with prolonged severe LBP. Type I MC tended to associate with pain more strongly than type II MC (OR 1.80, 95% CI 0.94-3.44 vs OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.88-2.09, respectively). Any MC (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.04-2.10), type II MC (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.31), MC affecting 2/3 posterior length (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.27-6.89), and extensive MC (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.21-3.15) were associated with disability. The strength of the associations increased with the number of MC.This large-scale study is the first to definitively note MC types and specific morphologies to be independently associated with prolonged severe LBP and back-related disability. This proposed refined MC phenotype may have direct implications in clinical decision-making as to the development and management of LBP. Understanding of these imaging biomarkers can lead to new preventative and personalized therapeutics related to LBP.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceLife StyleLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPersons with DisabilitiesPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID27258491
PMCPMC4900699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.