Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27258438›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives2016

The Importance of the Biological Impact of Exposure to the Concept of the Exposome.

Kristine K Dennis, Scott S Auerbach, David M Balshaw, Yuxia Cui, Margaret Daniele Fallin, Martyn T Smith, Avrum Spira, Susan Sumner, Gary W Miller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kristine K DennisDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Scott S Auerbach
David M Balshaw
Yuxia Cui
Margaret Daniele Fallin
Martyn T Smith
Avrum Spira
Susan Sumner
Gary W Miller

Funding

Biomolecular Screening and Alternative Approaches for the National Toxicology ProgramZIAES103318 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CASEY, WARREN · 2016 to 2021
$25.0M
RTI's Regional Comprehensive Metabolomics Resource CenterU24DK097193 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUMNER, SUSAN J · 2012 to 2017
$9.8M
Graduate and Postdoctoral Training in ToxicologyT32ES012870 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carmen Joseph Marsit · 2004 to 2026
$9.1M
National Exposure Assessment Laboratory at EmoryU2CES026560 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI VOS, MIRIAM B. · 2015 to 2015
$8.3M
Untargeted Analysis Research ResourceU2CES026544 · NIEHS · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI FENNELL, TIMOTHY RAYMOND · 2015 to 2018
$3.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK097193NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES012870NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026544NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe term "exposome" was originally coined in 2005 and defined as the totality of exposures throughout the lifetime. The exposome provides an excellent scientific framework for studying human health and disease. Recently, it has been suggested that how exposures affect our biology and how our bodies respond to such exposures should be part of the exposome.

objectivesThe authors describe the biological impact of the exposome and outline many of the targets and processes that can be assessed as part of a comprehensive analysis of the exposome. DISCUSSION: The processes that occur downstream from the initial interactions with exogenous and endogenous compounds determine the biological impact of exposures. If the effects are not considered in the same context as the exposures, it will be difficult to determine cause and effect. The exposome and biology are interactive-changes in biology due to the environment change one's vulnerability to subsequent exposures. Additionally, highly resilient individuals are able to withstand environmental exposures with minimal effects to their health. We expect that the vast majority of exposures are transient, and chemicals underlying exposures that occurred weeks, months, or years ago are long gone from the body. However, these past chemical exposures often leave molecular fingerprints that may be able to provide information on these past exposures.

conclusionsThrough linking exposures to specific biological responses, exposome research could serve to improve understanding of the mechanistic connections between exposures and health to help mitigate adverse health outcomes across the lifespan. CITATION: Dennis KK, Auerbach SS, Balshaw DM, Cui Y, Fallin MD, Smith MT, Spira A, Sumner S, Miller GW. 2016. The importance of the biological impact of exposure to the concept of the exposome. Environ Health Perspect 124:1504-1510; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP140.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental HealthEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsGuidelines as TopicHumansEnvironmental Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID27258438
PMCPMC5047763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.